ADHD symptoms across the lifespan in a population-based Swedish sample aged 65 to 80
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to examine the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomatology across the lifespan by comparing older individuals' self-reports about current ADHD symptoms and symptoms in childhood. METHODS: The 25-item Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS) was initially administered in a population-based sample of 1,599 persons aged 65-80 years. We also asked about current health, memory, and problems in childhood. Based on their WURS scores (below and above 36), we randomly drew two subsamples, each with 30 individuals. They were followed up by the Wender Riktad ADHD Symtom Skala (WRASS)-scale, a Swedish version of the Targeted Attention Deficit Disorder Rating Scale (TADDS). RESULTS: Our main finding was that higher WURS scores were significantly related to higher scores on the WRASS scale, indicating persistence of self-reported ADHD symptoms over the whole lifespan. Among those with a WURS score of 36 or more, 16 (53.3%) individuals scored 70 or more; the clinical cut-off used in Sweden. None of the individuals with a WURS score below 36 scored higher than 70 on the WRASS scale. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the idea of a significant persistence of ADHD symptoms from childhood to old age. The results encourage studies of ADHD using a lifespan perspective, particularly in examining ADHD symptoms in old age.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The low number of ADHD diagnoses may indicate that awareness of ADHD in older adults is a recent phenomenon.
“This may indicate that awareness of the possible existence of ADHD not only in children and young adults but also in older adults is a recent phenomenon”
From Older Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders in Sweden: A Register Study of Diagnoses, Psychiatric Care Utilization and Psychotropic Medication of 601 Individuals (2018) · cites this paper as Guldberg-Kjär et al. 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Guldberg-Kjär, T., Sehlin, S., & Johansson, B.
- Affiliations
- Region Skåne (SE)
- Kungälvs Sjukhus (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Guldberg-Kjär, Taina
- ORCID
- Johansson, Boo
- Venue
- International Psychogeriatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 667-675
- ISSN
- 1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158621716
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, childhood ADHD, older adults, Wender Utah Rating Scale, memory impairment
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Population Surveillance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review