Cited by 45Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

ADHD symptoms across the lifespan in a population-based Swedish sample aged 65 to 80

Open access
Guldberg-Kjär, Taina, Sehlin, Sally, Johansson, Boo·2013·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to examine the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomatology across the lifespan by comparing older individuals' self-reports about current ADHD symptoms and symptoms in childhood. METHODS: The 25-item Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS) was initially administered in a population-based sample of 1,599 persons aged 65-80 years. We also asked about current health, memory, and problems in childhood. Based on their WURS scores (below and above 36), we randomly drew two subsamples, each with 30 individuals. They were followed up by the Wender Riktad ADHD Symtom Skala (WRASS)-scale, a Swedish version of the Targeted Attention Deficit Disorder Rating Scale (TADDS). RESULTS: Our main finding was that higher WURS scores were significantly related to higher scores on the WRASS scale, indicating persistence of self-reported ADHD symptoms over the whole lifespan. Among those with a WURS score of 36 or more, 16 (53.3%) individuals scored 70 or more; the clinical cut-off used in Sweden. None of the individuals with a WURS score below 36 scored higher than 70 on the WRASS scale. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the idea of a significant persistence of ADHD symptoms from childhood to old age. The results encourage studies of ADHD using a lifespan perspective, particularly in examining ADHD symptoms in old age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610212002050

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 45

Authors
Guldberg-Kjär, T., Sehlin, S., & Johansson, B.
Affiliations
  • Region Skåne (SE)
  • Kungälvs Sjukhus (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Guldberg-Kjär, Taina
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
667-675
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158621716
Cited by
45
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, childhood ADHD, older adults, Wender Utah Rating Scale, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Population Surveillance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review