Cited by 60Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Adjustment, depression, and anxiety in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia: a systematic review of psychological intervention studies.

Open access
Regan, Bridget, Varanelli, Laura·2013·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

Background Many people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early dementia suffer from concomitant depression and anxiety disorders, which in some cases, may be related difficulties adjusting to their diagnosis and associated cognitive problems. Successful adjustment and alleviation of depression and anxiety symptoms in these people is of critical importance for quality of life and may also help prevent, or delay, further cognitive decline. A variety of psychosocial intervention approaches has been trialed with this group. Method The literature was systematically searched for community-based intervention studies that aim to improve depression, anxiety, or adjustment. Studies were included or excluded using a priori criteria. Once included, the quality of studies was evaluated using pre-set criteria. Results Seventeen of 925 studies identified through literature databases and manual searches met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 16 were considered to be of at least "adequate quality." These included seven randomized controlled trials and eight pre-post studies. A diverse range of psychotherapeutic approaches, formats (individual or group), outcome measures, inclusion criteria, and cultural contexts were apparent, making comparisons between studies challenging. Conclusions Several studies have demonstrated positive findings in the treatment of depression in older adults with early dementia using problem solving and modified cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) approaches. Amongs…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s104161021300152x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 47 · Cited by 60

Authors
Regan, B., & Varanelli, L.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Regan, Bridget
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
1963-1984
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071571525
Cited by
60
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, early-stage dementia, depression, anxiety, psychological adjustment, psychosocial interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, older adults, quality of life, cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Dementia, Depression, Humans, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review