Cited by 123Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection

APOE ε4 and the risk for Alzheimer disease and cognitive decline in African Americans and Yoruba

Open access
Hendrie, Hugh C., Murrell, Jill, Baiyewu, Olusegun, Lane, Kathleen A., Purnell, Christianna, Ogunniyi, Adesola, Unverzagt, Frederick W., Hall, Kathleen +6 more·2014·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little information on the association of the APOEe4 allele and AD risk in African populations. In previous analyses from the Indianapolis-Ibadan dementia project, we have reported that APOE ε4 increased the risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in African Americans but not in Yoruba. This study represents a replication of this earlier work using enriched cohorts and extending the analysis to include cognitive decline. METHODS: In this longitudinal study of two community dwelling cohorts of elderly Yoruba and African Americans, APOE genotyping was conducted from blood samples taken on or before 2001 (1,871 African Americans & 2,200 Yoruba). Mean follow up time was 8.5 years for African Americans and 8.8 years for Yoruba. The effects of heterozygosity or homozygosity of ε4 and of the possession of e4 on time to incident AD and on cognitive decline were determined using Cox's proportional hazards regression and mixed effects models. RESULTS: After adjusting for covariates, one or two copies of the APOE ε4 allele were significant risk factors for incident AD (p < 0.0001) and cognitive decline in the African-American population (p < 0001). In the Yoruba, only homozygosity for APOE ε4 was a significant risk factor for AD (p = 0.0002) but not for cognitive decline (p = 0.2346), however, possession of an e4 allele was significant for both incident AD (p = 0.0489) and cognitive decline (p = 0.0425). CONCLUSIONS: In this large longitudinal comparative study, APOE ε4 had a significant, but weaker, effect on incident AD and on cognitive decline in Yoruba than in African Americans. The reasons for these differences remain unclear.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610214000167

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The influence of the APOE-e4 allele on Alzheimer's risk may be stronger for White Americans than Black Americans.

    “the influence of the APOE-e4 allele on Alzheimer's risk may be stronger for White Americans than Black Americans”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Discussion reports that APOE ε4 increases incident Alzheimer’s risk in African Americans, but the study compares African Americans with Yoruba, not White Americans. The Introduction mentions no discernible difference between African American and Caucasian populations for cognitive decline, which is a different outcome; the claimed comparison in Alzheimer’s risk is not established. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The influence of the APOE-e4 allele on Alzheimer's risk may be stronger for White Americans than Black Americans.

    “While there is some research into how the influence of genetic risk factors on Alzheimer's and other dementias may differ by race — for example, the influence of the APOE‐e4 allele on Alzheimer's risk may be stronger for White Americans than Black Americans”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Discussion reports that APOE ε4 increases incident Alzheimer’s risk in the African American cohort. But the study compares African Americans with Yoruba participants, not White Americans, so it does not establish the claimed White–Black difference in effect strength. The Introduction’s comparison with Caucasian populations concerns cognitive decline and reports no discernible difference in effect size. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some studies found that having the APOE-e4 allele did not increase Alzheimer's risk among Blacks, while other studies found that it significantly increased risk.

    “For example, some have found that having the e4 allele did not increase risk among Blacks, [80][81][82] while other studies have found that it significantly increased risk.[83][84][85][86]”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [83]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 123

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Pychiatric Association Press 1992 ICD-10 The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: 1 and 2

Authors
Hendrie, H. C., Murrell, J., Baiyewu, O., Lane, K. A., Purnell, C., Ogunniyi, A., Unverzagt, F. W., Hall, K., Callahan, C. M., Saykin, A. J., Gureje, O., Hake, A., Foroud, T., & Gao, S.
Affiliations
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Hendrie, Hugh C.
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
977-985
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148537480
Cited by
123
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • PMC
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001108)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG010133, R01AG09956, R01AG019771, P30 AG-10133, R01AG009956)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Keywords
APOE ε4, Alzheimer's disease risk, cognitive decline, African Americans, Yoruba, genetic risk factors, replication study
MeSH terms
Aged, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Black or African American, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Nigeria, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Black People, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Apolipoprotein E4, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review