Cited by 49Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth, Education, and Aging

Public knowledge about dementia in South Korea: a community-based cross-sectional survey

Open access
Seo, Hyun-Ju, Lee, Dong Young, Sung, Mi Ra·2015·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

Background The highest increase in the prevalence of dementia in the elderly population is expected in South Korea than in any other country in the world. However, there is no assessment of the community-based general populations' understanding of dementia in South Korea, in spite of the increasing burden of dementia. Thus, this study assessed the public knowledge about dementia. Methods This is a population-based, cross-sectional study of 2,189 participants, aged 10 years or older, and living in Seoul, South Korea. A 12-item questionnaire with true/false responses was used to assess the knowledge about dementia from June to November 2011. The data obtained were analyzed using quantitative methods. Results The mean score for the knowledge about dementia was 9.0 ± 2.1 points out of 12 points. More than half of the respondents (52.7%) reported that dementia is not treatable, and one-third of the participants did not know that Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia. The level of dementia knowledge was negatively associated with increasing age, and positively associated with higher education level. Conclusions Our results suggest that although laypersons had a fair knowledge about dementia, further educational programs and campaigns are needed to improve knowledge about dementia, more focusing on elderly adults as the target audience and emphasizing the causes and treatments of dementia as educational contents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610214001896

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Public knowledge about dementia can affect behaviors and attitudes towards this syndrome.

    “Public knowledge about dementia can affect behaviors and attitudes towards this syndrome. 5-9”
  • The dementia knowledge level in this study is low compared to Seo et al.'s study in South Korea.

    “Nevertheless, when compared to the findings of Seo et al.'s, study in South Korea (mean score for dementia knowledge is 9.0±2.1 out of 12 points), this level is low in general terms.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seo, H.-J., Lee, D. Y., & Sung, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Chosun University (KR)
  • Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
  • Yong-in Songdam College (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Dong Young
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
463-469
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123758739
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Seoul National University Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health, Education, and Aging
Keywords
dementia knowledge, public understanding of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, age and education as predictors, health education campaigns, South Korea
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Young Adult, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review