Cited by 156Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Qualitative study on needs and wishes of early-stage dementia caregivers: the paradox between needing and accepting help.

Open access
Boots, Lizzy M.M., Wolfs, Claire A.G., Verhey, Frans R.J., Kempen, Gertrudis I.J.M., de Vugt, Marjolein E.·2015·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early individualized interventions for informal dementia caregivers can prevent overburdening in the later stages. However, the needs of early-stage dementia caregivers (EDC) remain largely unknown. This study aimed to explore the needs and wishes and need for care of EDC to maximize the benefit of potential programs for EDC and tailor interventions accordingly. METHODS: Four focus group interviews with 28 informal caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Both EDC and caregivers in the later stages were included to compare perceived EDC needs from different points in the caregiver career. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: the early-stage needs paradox, barriers in acceptance, facilitators in acceptance, and a transition from loss to adaptation. The retrospective view provided by later-stage caregivers differed from the view of EDC; EDC struggled with acknowledging needs due to fear of stigma and low acceptance. EDC stressed the importance of acceptance as a prerequisite for adequate adaptation, but were hindered by lack of knowledge, difficulty acknowledging changes, and focus on loss. In contrast, better understanding of the disease, increasing personal time, structuring ones day, and using appropriate humor can reduce negative communication, increase positive encounters and caregiver-confidence, contributing to positive interaction with the care recipient and an increase in well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Early therapeutic interventions could help caregivers identify their needs, increase knowledge about changes in roles and relationship reciprocity, and focus on enhancement of the positive, intact experiences to prevent caregiver burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610214002804

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 156

Authors
Boots, L. M. M., Wolfs, C. A. G., Verhey, F. R. J., Kempen, G. I. J. M., & de Vugt, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
927-936
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135303482
Cited by
156
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer Nederland (WE03-2010-08)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
early-stage dementia, informal caregivers, caregiver needs, stigma, caregiver adaptation, caregiver well-being, caregiver interventions, caregiver-care recipient relationship
MeSH terms
Dementia, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Stereotyping, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review