Cited by 15Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Initial cognitive response to cholinesterase inhibitors and subsequent long-term course in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Droogsma, Erika, van Asselt, Dieneke, Diekhuis, Marjolein, Veeger, Nic, van der Hooft, Cornelis, De Deyn, Peter Paul·2015·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some guidelines recommend to discontinue treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) without an initial response to ChEI treatment. Evidence supporting this recommendation, however, is limited. This study aimed to investigate the relation between the initial cognitive response to ChEI treatment and the subsequent long-term course of cognition of AD patients. METHODS: The Frisian Alzheimer's Disease Cohort study is a retrospective longitudinal study of 576 community-dwelling AD patients treated with ChEIs in a "real-life" setting at a large memory clinic. A repeated measures analysis using a marginal model (population based averaged model) was applied to investigate whether there is a difference in the subsequent long-term course of cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)) between initial non-responders and responders. Absence of an initial response was defined as a lower MMSE score after the first six months of treatment compared to baseline, a positive response as the same or a higher MMSE score. RESULTS: At baseline, median age was 80 years and the median MMSE score 23. Non-responders showed a slower rate of cognitive decline in the three subsequent years than responders, with a mean annual MMSE decline of 0.9 points versus 1.2 points, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that it is not appropriate to discontinue ChEI treatment solely based on the absence of an initial cognitive response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610215000289

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observed rate of decline in MMSE for all non-users when accounting for ChEi use was slower than anticipated, at 0.60 points per year (Table 2), compared to the one-point decline per year observed in longitudinal trials on ChEi use in mild AD.

    “the observed rate of decline in MMSE for all non-users when accounting for ChEi use was slower than anticipated, at 0.60 points per year (Table 2), compared to the one-point decline per year observed in longitudinal trials on ChEi use in mild AD [32, 33]”

    From Long-Term Trazodone Use and Cognition: A Potential Therapeutic Role for Slow-Wave Sleep Enhancers (2019) · cites this paper as [33]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Caffarra, 2007, Comparing treatment effects in a clinical sample of patients with probable Alzheimer's disease treated with two different cholinesterase inhibitors, Acta Bio-medica, 78, 16
  2. Calabria, 2009, Efficacy of acetyl-cholinesterase-inhibitor (ACHEI) treatment in Alzheimer's disease: a 21-month follow-up “real world” study, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 49, 6, 10.1016/j.archger.2008.07.006 · DOI
  3. Cummings, 2003, Use of cholinesterase inhibitors in clinical practice. Evidence based recommendations, The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 131, 10.1097/00019442-200303000-00004 · DOI
  4. Cummings, 2012, Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 48-week study of efficacy and safety of a higher-dose rivastigmine patch (15 vs. 10 cm2) in Alzheimer's disease, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 33, 341, 10.1159/000340056 · DOI
  5. Hort, 2010, EFNS guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease, European Journal of Neurology, 17, 1236, 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03040.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ferri, 2005, Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study, Lancet, 366, 2112, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0 · DOI
  7. Folstein, 1975, “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189, 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Fortin, 2006, Randomized controlled trials: do they have external validity for patients with multiple comorbidities?, Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 104, 10.1370/afm.516 · DOI
  9. Gaudig, 2011, Effects of galantamine in Alzheimer's disease: double-blind withdrawal studies evaluating sustained versus interrupted treatment, Current Alzheimer Research, 8, 771, 10.2174/156720511797633205 · DOI
  10. Han, 2000, Tracking cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease using the Mini-Mental State Examination: a meta-analysis, International Psychogeriatrics, 12, 231, 10.1017/S1041610200006359 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hensel, 2007, Measuring cognitive change in older adults: reliable change indices for the mini-mental state examination, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 78, 1298, 10.1136/jnnp.2006.109074 · DOI
  12. Holthoff, 2011, Validation of the relevant outcome scale for Alzheimer's disease: a novel multidomain assessment for daily medical practice, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 3, 27, 10.1186/alzrt89 · DOI
  13. McKhann, 1984, Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer's disease, Neurology, 34, 189, 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Mendiondo, 2000, Modelling mini mental state examination changes in Alzheimer's disease, Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1607, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1607::AID-SIM449>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  15. Mohs, 2000, Longitudinal studies of cognitive, functional and behavioural change in patients with Alzheimer's disease, Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1401, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1401::AID-SIM432>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
  16. Mossello, 2004, Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a “real world” study, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Supplement, 9, 297, 10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.040 · DOI
  17. Pakrasi, 2003, Clinical predictors of response to Acetyl Cholinesterase Inhibitors: experience from routine clinical use in Newcastle, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 879, 10.1002/gps.928 · DOI
  18. Perry, 1978, Correlation of cholinergic abnormalities with senile plaques and mental test scores in senile dementia, BMJ, 2, 1457, 10.1136/bmj.2.6150.1457 · DOI
  19. Prince, 2013, The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis, Alzheimer's & Dementia, 9, 63, 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Qaseem, 2008, Current pharmacologic treatment of dementia: a clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians and the American academy of family physicians, Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 370, 10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00008 · DOI
  21. Rabins, 2007, American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Second edition, The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 5
  22. Raschetti, 2005, A cohort study of effectiveness of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 61, 361, 10.1007/s00228-005-0946-1 · DOI
  23. Reitz, 2011, Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease, Nature Reviews. Neurology, 7, 137, 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Rota, 2007, Short term response is predictive of long term response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease: a starting point to explore Bayesian approximation in clinical practice, Bioinformation, 2, 39, 10.6026/97320630002039 · DOI
  25. Rothwell, 2005, External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”, Lancet, 365, 82, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Salvi, 2008, A manual of guidelines to score the modified cumulative illness rating scale and its validation in acute hospitalized elderly patients, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 1926, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01935.x · DOI
  27. Schölzel-Dorenbos, 2009, Quality of life and burden of spouses of Alzheimer disease patients, Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 23, 171, 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318190a260 · DOI
  28. Shulman, 1993, Clock-drawing and dementia in the community: a longitudinal study, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 487, 10.1002/gps.930080606 · DOI
  29. Van der Putt, 2006, Effectiveness of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: diagnosis and severity as predictors of response in routine practice, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 755, 10.1002/gps.1557 · DOI
  30. Wallin, 2009, Can CSF biomarkers or pre-treatment progression rate predict response to cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in Alzheimer's disease, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 638, 10.1002/gps.2195 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Droogsma, E., van Asselt, D., Diekhuis, M., Veeger, N., van der Hooft, C., & De Deyn, P. P.
Affiliations
  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Droogsma, Erika
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1323-1333
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146539666
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
cholinesterase inhibitors, Alzheimer's disease, treatment response, cognitive decline, treatment discontinuation, Mini-Mental State Examination, community-dwelling patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Cognition, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review