CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Locating the ancient port of Muziris: fresh findings from Pattanam

Shajan, K. P., Tomber, R., Selvakumar, V., Cherian, P. J.·2004·Journal of Roman Archaeology
DOI 10.1017/s1047759400008278
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1047759400008278

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pattanam is generally identified with the port of Muziris, mentioned in Roman as well as Tamil literary sources.

    “Arguably the most important Indian site excavated after Arikamedu is Pattanam, generally identified with the port of Muziris, mentioned in Roman as well as Tamil literary sources”

    From Archaeology of Trade in the Western Indian Ocean, 300 BC–AD 700 (2014) · cites this paper as Shajan et al. 2004

  • Excavations at coastal Pattanam have produced an array of South Asian and nonlocal materials, including Roman glass, terra sigillata, amphorae, Gulf torpedo jars, and South Arabian storage jars.

    “In the southwest, excavations at coastal Pattanam have produced an array of South Asian and nonlocal materials, including Roman glass, terra sigillata, and amphorae (Cherian et al. 2007, Shajan et al. 2004, Tomber 2017); Gulf torpedo jars; and South Arabian storage jars (Buffa 2017).”

    From Recent Developments in the Archaeology of Long-Distance Connections Across the Ancient Indian Ocean (2023) · cites this paper as Shajan et al. 2004

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 1987, Sabdhataravaly
  2. 1989, J. Geological Soc. India, 33, 216
  3. 1996, Trade, ideology and urbanization: south India 300 B.C. to A.D. 1300
  4. 1975, Purāttava, 8, 110
  5. 1989, The Periplus Maris Erythraei. Text with introduction, translation and commentary
  6. 1961, A Dravidian etymological dictionary
  7. 1994, Excavations at South Shields Roman fort, 1
  8. 1946, Ancient India, 2, 17
  9. The ancient port of Arikamedu. New excavations and researches, 1989-1992,, 2
  10. 1977, Asian Perspectives, 20.2, 228
  11. 1996, The ancient port of Arikamedu. New excavations and researches 1989-92,, 1
  12. 1966, A comparative dictionary of the Indo-Aryan languages
  13. 1946, Annual report of the Archaeological Department, Cochin State for the year 1121 M.E. (1945-46)
  14. 2004, Proc. Seminar South Arabian Studies, 34, 351
  15. 2000, Antiquity, 74, 624, 10.1017/S0003598X00059986 · DOI
  16. 1996, Perumals of Kerala. Political and social conditions of Kerala under the Cera Perumals of Makotai
  17. 2001, J. Geological Soc. India, 57, 545
  18. 1991, Alagankulam: an Indo-Roman trading port, 247
  19. 1914, Amarakosam Vyaakhyanam
  20. 1991, A survey of Kerala history
  21. 1988, Proc. Indian Nat. Science Acad., 54A, 439
  22. 1991, Indian archaeological heritage. K. V. Soundara Rajan Festchrift, 1
  23. 1995, J. Geological Soc. India, 46, 157, 10.17491/jgsi/1995/460206 · DOI
  24. 2001, JRA, 14, 335
  25. 1999, Cultural history of Kerala, 1
  26. 1985, Survey of India, Topographic Map. Sheet 58 B/4
  27. 1999, Holocene sea level changes inferred from geo-archaeological studies in the Kodungallur area, south-west coast of India, 315
  28. J. Centre Heritage Studies, Thripunithura, India, 1
  29. 1992, Catalogue of Roman gold coins
  30. 1999, Proc. int. conference on Land-Sea Links in Asia, Geological Survey of Japan, March 15-19, Tsukuba
  31. 1976, Souvenir 37th Annual Meeting Indian Historical Congress, Calicut University, India, Dec. 29-31, 6
  32. 1986, Amphorae and the Roman economy. An introductory guide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shajan, K. P., Tomber, R., Selvakumar, V., & Cherian, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Roman Archaeology
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2004
Volume
17
Pages
312-320
ISSN
  • 1047-7594
  • 2331-5709
DOI
10.1017/s1047759400008278
Cited by
27
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 4064 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review