The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Historical Performance of Commodity and Stock Markets
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines two interrelated issues in commodity markets, namely, the cyclical relationship between stocks and commodities and the function of commodity and agribusiness indexes in portfolios. A high negative correlation has existed between stock and commodity prices over the past 140 years. Moreover, the two markets have alternated in price leadership with 29-32-year cycles. The recent price dominance in agricultural commodities started in 2000, a result supported by the empirical results of the portfolio allocation analysis. For a risk-averse investor, irrespective of the period analyzed, placing funds in agribusiness and/or agricultural commodity indexes was sound investing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures










Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The research by Zapata et al. (2012) highlights that the representation of agricultural sectors in thematic indexes may not fully capture the diversity of the agricultural market, potentially leading to mispricing and increased volatility.”
From Food Financialization: Impact of Derivatives and Index Funds on Agri-Food Market Volatility (2024) · cites this paper as Zapata et al. (2012)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*
Sharpe, W. F. (1964) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x · Cited by 19,441
Lintner, J. (1965) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1924119 · Cited by 7,888
Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk
Sharpe, W. F. (1964) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2977928 · Cited by 7,556
Lintner, J. (1975) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-780850-5.50018-6 · Cited by 6,747
Christiano, L. J., & Fitzgerald, T. J. (1999) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00076 · Cited by 1,819
Facts and Fantasies about Commodity Futures
Gorton, G. B., & Rouwenhorst, K. G. (2006) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v62.n2.4083 · Cited by 1,384
Ang, A., Chen, J. S., & Xing, Y. (2006) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj035 · Cited by 1,042
Handbook of Agricultural EconomicsPreprint
Gardner, B. L., & Rausser, G. C. (2002) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 906
How Profitable Is Capital Structure Arbitrage?
Yu, F. (2006) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v62.n5.4282 · Cited by 466
Tomek, W. G., & Robinson, K. L. (1972) · Cited by 452
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Shiller, Online Data
- Damodaran, 2009, Betas by Sector
- 2006, MSNBC Online
- Kahn, 2008, Agriculture Sector Still Sprouting Winners
- Domanski, 2007, Bank for International Settlements Quarterly Review, 53
- Bannister, 2002, Equity Research Industrial Portfolio Strategy, Legg Mason
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Food Financialization: Impact of Derivatives and Index Funds on Agri-Food Market Volatility
Venegas, M. D. R., Feregrino, J., Lay, N., & Espinosa-Cristia, J. F. (2024) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs12040121 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Zapata, H. O., Detre, J. D., & Hanabuchi, T.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-357
- ISSN
- 0081-3052 (ISSN-L)
- 1074-0708
- 2056-7405
- OpenAlex
- W1932388932
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ageconsearch.umn.edu
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
- Funders
- Harvard University
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Harvard Kennedy School
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Keywords
- commodity markets, stock market, asset allocation, risk-averse investors, asset diversification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review