Predators and Predation in Paleozoic Marine Environments
Abstract
The Paleozoic body fossil record of potential benthic predators includes nautiloid and ammonoid cephalopods, phyllocarids, decapods, and several lineages of gnathostomes. The latter group, in particular, radiated rapidly during the Devonian. In the pelagic realm, predator-prey interactions involving cephalopods and some nektonic arthropods probably appeared in the Ordovician. Again, evidence indicates intensification of pelagic predation, much of it by arthrodires and sharks on other fishes, during the Devonian radiation of gnathostomes. Trace fossils provide direct evidence of predatory attack from the Ediacarian and Early Cambrian onward, but with a substantial increase in the Siluro-Devonian. Brachiopod and molluscan shells and trilobite exoskeletons show evidence of healed bite marks and peeling from the Cambrian onward, but with an increased frequency in the Devonian. Predatory drill holes with stereotypical position and prey-species preference are found in brachiopods (Cambrian onward) and mollusks (Ordovician onward); boreholes also show increased frequency in the middle Paleozoic. Certain of these boreholes are tentatively attributable to platyceratid gastropods. Hard-shelled benthic organisms with thicker, more spinose skeletons may have had a selective advantage as durophagous predators increased. Brachiopods, gastropods, trilobites, and crinoids show an abrupt increase in spinosity beginning in the Siluro-Devonian. But spinosity decreases after the early Carboniferous. Late Paleozoic benthos may have taken refuge in smaller size and resistant, thick-walled skeletons, as well as endobenthic and cementing modes of life. Conversely, in the pelagic realm, external armor was reduced, while more efficient, fast-swimming modes of life (e.g., in sharks) increased in the post-Devonian.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reciprocal feedbacks between the two main groups of jawed metazoans and invertebrate prey were an important evolutionary feedback loop of the Middle Palaeozoic.
“Reciprocal feedbacks between the two main groups of jawed metazoans and invertebrate prey are here suggested to have been an important evolutionary feedback loop of the Middle Palaeozoic (Brett & Walker 2002, Vermeij 2013).”
From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Brett & Walker 2002
Reciprocal feedbacks between prey and their defence structures (e.g. in arthropods and echinoderms) and either group of competing jawed predators (and increasing efficiency of both locomotory structures and jaws) appear quite likely.
“Reciprocal feedbacks between prey and their defence structures, e.g . in arthropods and echinoderms (see for example Reich & Smith 2009) and either group of competing jawed predators (and increasing efficiency of both locomotory structures and jaws), appear quite likely ( cf . Vermeij 1987, 1994, 2013; Brett & Walker 2002).”
From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Brett & Walker 2002
Cites
The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers
Vermeij, G. J. (1977) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300005352 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
Predatorial Borings in Late Precambrian Mineralized Exoskeletons
Bengtson, S., & Zhao, Y. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.257.5068.367 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Co-evolution of oceans, climate, and the biosphere during the ‘Ordovician Revolution’: A review
Algeo, T. J., Marenco, P. J., & Saltzman, M. R. (2016) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.05.015 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Bicknell, R. D. C., & Paterson, J. R. (2018) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12365 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Information landscapes and sensory ecology of the Cambrian Radiation
Plotnick, R. E., Dornbos, S. Q., & Chen, J. (2010) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1666/08062.1 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts
Klug, C., Frey, L., Pohle, A., De Baets, K., & Korn, D. (2017) · Bulletin of Geosciences · doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1648 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Adaptive responses in Cambrian predator and prey highlight the arms race during the rise of animals
Bicknell, R. D. C., Campione, N. E., Brock, G. A., & Paterson, J. R. (2025) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.007 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brett, C. E., & Walker, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- ORCID
- Brett, Carlton E.
- Venue
- The Paleontological Society Papers
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 93-118
- ISSN
- 1089-3326 (ISSN-L)
- 2399-7575
- OpenAlex
- W2990492156
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Paleontological Society Papers (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Paleontological Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- predation, benthic predators, cephalopods, nautiloids, ammonoids, Decapoda, gnathostomes, sharks, trace fossils, bite marks, drill holes, brachiopods, Mollusca, trilobites, durophagy, Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review