Defining Response and Remission in Anxiety Disorders: Toward an Integrated Approach
Abstract
Response and remission rates are commonly used to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders and other psychiatric illnesses. Response is generally regarded as a clinically meaningful improvement in symptoms, while remission, the goal of treatment, is generally thought of as the absence or near absence of symptoms following illness, accompanied by a return to premorbid levels of functioning. Response and remission are often defined using psychiatric rating scales, based on score cutoffs or the magnitude of score changes from baseline. While no universally accepted criteria exist, a commonly used threshold for response is a > 50% improvement in the total score, while for remission, various cutoff points have been used. Comparison of cutoffs or change scores for disease-specific scales with Clinical Global Impressions ratings is a useful way of evaluating response and remission criteria across disorders. To illustrate the use of disease-specific and global measures, this article summarizes data from randomized, placebo-controlled studies of adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, or panic disorder treated with the serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine extended release, for which acute-phase data are available (a total of 13 trials).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is no unequivocal definition of treatment-resistant panic disorder, and very heterogeneous criteria have been used across studies, making interpretation of results uncertain.
“Currently, there is no unequivocal definition of TRPD. Very heterogeneous criteria have been used across different studies, making interpretation of the results uncertain.”
From Management of Treatment-Resistant Panic Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Bandelow, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bandelow, Borwin
- ORCID
- Bandelow, Borwin
- Venue
- CNS Spectrums
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- S12
- Pages
- 21-28
- ISSN
- 1092-8529 (ISSN-L)
- 2165-6509
- OpenAlex
- W2437129297
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CNS Spectrums (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- anxiety disorders, treatment response, remission, response criteria, remission criteria, psychiatric rating scales, Clinical Global Impression Scale, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, venlafaxine extended release, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Anxiety Disorders, Cyclohexanols, Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review