Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fixated Threat Assessment Centers: preventing harm and facilitating care in public figure threat cases and those thought to be at risk of lone-actor grievance-fueled violence

Barry-Walsh, Justin, James, David V., Mullen, Paul E.·2020·CNS Spectrums

Abstract

The rediscovery of the importance of mental illness in the risk assessment and management of those who threaten, approach, and harm public figures has led to a new way of dealing with those that threaten public figures. This approach emphasises the role of “fixation” which may be defined as an intense preoccupation pursued to an abnormally intense degree. It integrates a threat assessment paradigm with the literature on stalking. The need for such an approach was highlighted in research on the prevalence of harassment of public figures. Psychiatry has a key role in this approach which sees mental health clinicians and Police work together in Fixated Threat Assessment Centres (FTACs). An FTAC functions by assessing the level of concern and sharing information to facilitate interventions that are often mental health based. The purpose is not the hopeless task of identifying those who will go on to perpetrate serious violence, rather to intervene in the group they emerge from, to prevent harm. As well as decreasing risk to the persons fixated upon, this approach improves care to the mentally disordered people who harass and threaten them and, in doing so, decreases the likelihood of their criminalization while enhancing their quality of life. As expertise in the area has grown, policing and security agencies in several countries have expanded the FTAC model to cover individuals thought at risk of lone-actor grievance-fueled violence, a term that captures both different forms of mass killing and lone actor terrorism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1092852920000152

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Zona, 1998, Psyhciatric diagnosis and the offender-victim typology of stalking, 70
  2. 10.1002/bsl.2266 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01077.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. James, 2010, Abnormal attentions toward the British Royal Family: factors associated with approach and escalation, J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 38, 329
  5. Pathé, 2013, The harassment of Queensland members of parliament: a mental health concern, Psychiatry Psychol Law, 21, 1
  6. 10.1177/1088767912462033 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/14789941003596981 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809287-3.00009-2 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1177/0004867415581022 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/bsl.2254 · DOI
  11. 10.1520/JFS14457J · DOI
  12. 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1008341 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/14789940903174063 · DOI
  14. Kegel, 1930, The municipal psychopathic laboratory, Chicago Health, 24, 114
  15. Oliver, 1929, Foursquare. The Story of a Fourfold Life
  16. 10.1177/0004867415583700 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/14789949.2017.1335762 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/13218719.2018.1506722 · DOI · Paper page
  19. van der Meer, 2012, Disturbing communications and problematic approaches to the Dutch Royal Family, J Forens Psychiatry Psychol, 23, 571, 10.1080/14789949.2012.727453 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Scalora, 2008, Stalking, Threatening and Attacking Public Figures: A Psychological and Behvioral Analysis, 425, 10.1093/med:psych/9780195326383.003.0019 · DOI
  21. 10.1520/JFS15575J · DOI
  22. 59. Voerman, B . Netherlands National Police Threat Management Team. Paper presented at: Annual Conference of the European Network of Public Figure Threat Assessment Agencies; 2015; London, UK.
  23. 10.1002/bsl.564 · DOI
  24. Vossekuil, 2015, Threat assessment: assessing the risk of targeted violence, J Threat Assess Manag, 2, 243, 10.1037/tam0000055 · DOI
  25. McCauley, 2013, Charactersitics of lone wolf violent offenders: a comparison of assassins and school attackers, Perspect Terror, 7, 4
  26. Mullen, 2009, Stalkers and Their Victims
  27. Dietz, 1991, Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States congress, J Forensic Sci, 36, 1445, 10.1520/JFS13165J · DOI
  28. 10.1080/14789949.2015.1124908 · DOI
  29. James, 2015, The Fixated, Lone Actors and Grievance Fuelled Violence
  30. 10.1037/tam0000024 · DOI
  31. Government, 2015, Revised Prevent Duty Guidance for England and Wales
  32. 2006, Inappropriate Communications, Approaches, and Attacks on the British Royal Family with Additional Consideration of Attacks on Politicians
  33. James, 2008, Attacks on the British Royal family: the role of psychotic illness, J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 36, 59
  34. 10.1002/bsl.979 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01835.x · DOI
  36. 10.1080/14789949.2015.1037332 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1002/bsl.2255 · DOI
  38. 10.4324/9781315766348 · DOI
  39. James, 2013, International Handbook of Threat Assessment, 299
  40. 10.1080/00091380903448997 · DOI
  41. 2006, Jakten på makten. Betänkande av Kommittén om hot och våld mot förtroendevalda [The Quest for Power. Report of the Committee on Threats and Violence Against Elected Officials]
  42. Malkki, 2016, Understanding Lone Actor Terrorism: Past Experience, Future Outlook, and Response Strategies
  43. 10.1177/0004867418773183 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/cbm.769 · DOI
  45. Weine, 2017, Utilizing mental health professionals to help prevent the next attacks, Int Rev Psychiatry, 29, 334, 10.1080/09540261.2017.1343533 · DOI
  46. 10.1192/pb.40.6.346 · DOI
  47. MacKenzie, 2009, Stalking Risk Profile: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Stalkers
  48. Regis, 1890, Les Régicides Dans L'histoire et Dans le Présent: Etude Médico-Psychologique
  49. 10.1080/14789949.2015.1124909 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/bsl.999 · DOI
  51. 10.1037/amp0000090 · DOI
  52. Dietz, 2010, Commentary: approaching and stalking public figures—a prerequisite to attack, J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 38, 341
  53. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199824)16:1<51::AID-BSL293>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  54. 10.1080/14789940802197074 · DOI
  55. Kirkbride, 2012, University of Cambridge IoPatM, Kings College London
  56. 2017, Inquest into the Deaths Arising from the Lindt Café siege: Findings and Recommendations
  57. James, 2014, Communications Threat Assessment Protocol-25: Guidelines for the Intial Assessment of Problematic Communications

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Barry-Walsh, J., James, D. V., & Mullen, P. E.
Venue
CNS Spectrums
Published
2020-04-07
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
630-637
ISSN
  • 1092-8529
  • 2165-6509
Cited by
25
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.