The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS AND LEVELS OF ENTRY (MAPLE): ENSURING CHOICE, ACCESSIBILITY AND EQUITY FOR CBT SERVICES
Abstract
Mental health problems contribute 23% to the global burden of disease in developed countries (WHO, 1999). In the U.K., recent legislation attempts to address this by modernizing mental health services so that they provide evidence based, accessible and non-discriminatory services for both serious and common mental health problems. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has a robust evidence base that fits very well with the thrust of policy. However, CBT's delivery systems are rooted in traditional service models, which pay little attention to the growing evidence base for brief and single-strand treatments over complex or multi-strand interventions. Services characterized by 9-5 working, hourly appointments and face-to-face therapy disenfranchise the majority of people who would benefit from CBT. In this paper we argue that the evidence exists for service protocols that promote equity, accessibility and choice and that CBT services should be organized around multiple levels of entry and service delivery rather than the more usual secondary care referral systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, treatment costs tend to be higher compared to primary care (Spijker et al., 2013) in combination with long waiting lists due to treatment duration and limited financial resources (Bower and Gilbody, 2005, Lovell and Richards, 2000).”
From Development and initial evaluation of blended cognitive behavioural treatment for major depression in routine specialized mental health care (2016) · cites this paper as Lovell and Richards, 2000
In the citing paper
“However, many patients do not access these treatments for a number of reasons, such as concerns over side effects (Weisberg, Dyck, Culpepper, & Keller, 2007), patient or therapist unwillingness to engage in exposure therapy, lack of trained therapists (Gunter & Whittal, 2010), and scheduling difficulties (Lovell & Richards, 2000).”
From Socially anxious primary care patients' attitudes toward cognitive bias modification (CBM): A qualitative study (2012) · cites this paper as Lovell & Richards, 2000
In the citing paper
“Organising services with multiple levels of entry and service delivery, rather than the more traditional single referral gateway at the level of primary care into secondary care services, may help to increase access to psychological therapies.3”
From Can a self-referral system help improve access to psychological treatments? (2010) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“However, because of their low capacity, access to psychological treatment services for individuals with these difficulties has often been variable and limited, with long waiting lists for these services.3”
From Can a self-referral system help improve access to psychological treatments? (2010) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“necessitating alternatives to one-to-one treatment delivery (Lovell & Richards, 2000) beyond the existing adjunctive use of self-help materials (Keeley et al , 2002).”
From Clinical efficacy of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: Randomised controlled trial (2004) · cites this paper as Lovell & Richards, 2000
Citations
Cites
What Works for Whom?: A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research
Roth, A. D., & Fonagy, P. (1996) · Cited by 1,382
Marks, I. M. (1987) · Cited by 978
The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy.
Howard, K. I., Kopta, S. M., Krause, M. S., & Orlinsky, D. E. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.2.159 · Cited by 891
(1997) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 714
The Science and Practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Clark, D. M., Fairburn, C. G., & Jones, J. V. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.11.2.141 · Cited by 447
Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders.
Chambless, D. L., & Gillis, M. M. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.61.2.248 · Cited by 437
The use of bibliotherapy in the treatment of panic: A preliminary investigation
Gould, R. A., Clum, G. A., & Shapiro, D. (1993) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80266-7 · Cited by 160
Gould, R. A., & Clum, G. A. (1995) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80099-1 · Cited by 109
Exposure versus cognitive restructuring in the treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia
Bouchard, S., Gauthier, J., Laberge, B., French, D., Pelletier, M.-H., & Godbout, C. (1996) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)00077-1 · Cited by 102
COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL TREATMENT OF POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER AFTER MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT
Fecteau, G. W., & Nicki, R. M. (1999) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s135246589927302x · Cited by 95
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bower, P., & Gilbody, S. (2005) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.186.1.11 · Cited by 1,084
“There is a general perception that minimal interventions are best restricted to less severe disorders, although the evidence for this is not definitive (Lovell & Richards, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialUsing the Internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy
Andersson, G. (2009) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.01.010 · Cited by 560
“Given the lack of trained CBT practitioners and low uptake of evidence-based treatments (Lovell & Richards, 2000), it would be inappropriate not to use Internet treatment at least as a complement to our other treatments.”
BackgroundProudfoot, J., Ryden, C., Everitt, B., Shapiro, D. A., Goldberg, D., Mann, A., Tylee, A., Marks, I., & Gray, J. A. (2004) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.185.1.46 · Cited by 516
“…treatments (Tylee, 2001); however, therapist shortages engender unacceptable waiting times (Clinical Standards Advisory Group, 1999), necessitating alternatives to one-to-one treatment delivery (Lovell & Richards, 2000) beyond the existing adjunctive use of self-help materials (Keeley et al, 2002).”
BackgroundBehavioral activation treatments for depression in adults: A meta-analysis and review.
Mazzucchelli, T., Kane, R., & Rees, C. (2009) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01178.x · Cited by 438
Computer‐Aided Psychotherapy for Anxiety Disorders: A Meta‐Analytic Review
Cuijpers, P., Marks, I. M., van Straten, A., Cavanagh, K., Gega, L., & Andersson, G. (2009) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070802694776 · Cited by 429
“When they do, they are commonly put on long wait lists (Lovell & Richards, 2000), and the treatment that they eventually receive is often not evidence-based (Andrews, Issakidis, Sanderson, Corry, & Lapsley, 2004).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovell, K., & Richards, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Venue
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 379-391
- ISSN
- 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1833
- OpenAlex
- W2155900414
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, mental health services, service organizations, accessibility, equity, choice, brief intervention, secondary care referral, service delivery models, mental health policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
