Outcome of Cognitive-Behavioural Treatment for Health Anxiety (Hypochondriasis) in a Routine Clinical Setting
Abstract
It has now been established in several randomized controlled trials that specialist cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for severe and persistent health anxiety (diagnostically, “Hypochondriasis”). It has not yet been established whether or not such results will generalize from academic research centres to routine clinical settings. The present study was designed to address the issue of generalization by evaluating the outcome of a consecutive series of patients meeting diagnostic criteria for hypochondriasis, treated using CBT in a non-academic clinic in Copenhagen, Denmark. The delivery of the treatment was adapted to fit with the practice of the clinic, so that the later components of therapy were delivered in a group therapy setting. Therapists participated in a brief training course, which was subsequently supplemented by expert clinical and peer supervision. Patients received the same amount of treatment used in previous clinical trials. Results indicate that the degree of improvement obtained in this study was significant and compared well with those obtained in the previous trials. These results support the use of dissemination of new treatments using a specialist training model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One previous study reported an exacerbation of health-anxious patients' concerns in a group CBT treatment due to participants sharing their concerns with each other leading to an increased focus on illness concerns.
“Finally, one previous study reported an exacerbation of HA patients' concerns in a group CBT treatment due to participants sharing their concerns with each other leading to an increased focus on illness concerns (Wattar et al ., 2005)”
From Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for severe health anxiety (hypochondriasis): An interpretative phenomenological analysis of patients' experiences (2011) · cites this paper as Wattar et al., 2005
Wattar et al. (2005) reported having to modify the format of their group CBT because participants experienced increased anxiety as a result of discussions about each other's health concerns.
“In contrast, Wattar et al . (2005) reported having to modify the format of their group CBT because participants experienced increased anxiety as a result of discussions about each other's health concerns.”
From Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for severe health anxiety (hypochondriasis): An interpretative phenomenological analysis of patients' experiences (2011) · cites this paper as Wattar et al. (2005)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Wattar, U., Sorensen, P., Buemann, I., Birket-Smith, M., Salkovskis, P. M., Albertsen, M., & Strange, S.
- ORCID
- Salkovskis, Paul M.
- Venue
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-175
- ISSN
- 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1833
- OpenAlex
- W2043307836
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Warwick
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- health anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment outcomes, routine clinical practice, group therapy, therapist training, clinical supervision, dissemination of evidence-based treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review