Cited by 48Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The Credibility and Acceptability of Befriending as a Control Therapy in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Acute First Episode Psychosis

Bendall, Sarah, Jackson, Henry J., Killackey, Eoin, Allott, Kelly, Johnson, Tracy, Harrigan, Susan, Gleeson, John, McGorry, Patrick D.·2006·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is efficacious in treating psychosis. However, very little attention has been paid to the nature of the control treatments used in studies of this. Befriending has been used as a control treatment in several randomized control trials (RCTs) of CBT for psychosis as it is simple to learn and administer. The aim of the present study was to examine whether Befriending controlled for important non-specific aspects of therapy when compared to CBT in a RCT for acute first episode psychosis (FEP). These non-specific factors included time in, expectancy created by, and acceptability of therapy. Expectations and enjoyment of therapy were measured by questionnaire. Time in therapy and the number of drop-outs were also recorded. Results showed that Befriending was comparable to CBT on measures of expectancy, enjoyment of therapy and drop-out rate, but significantly different with regard to time in therapy. This suggests that Befriending is a credible and acceptable control therapy for FEP with modification to increase time in therapy sessions. Methodological issues are raised, and suggestions for future research are made regarding control treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465806002815

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bendall, S., Jackson, H. J., Killackey, E., Allott, K., Johnson, T., Harrigan, S., Gleeson, J., & McGorry, P. D.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2006-03-27
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
277-291
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W1979057116
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
befriending, cognitive behavioral therapy, first-episode psychosis, acute psychosis, treatment discontinuation, placebo comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review