Cited by 43Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Metacognitions about Procrastination: A Preliminary Investigation

Fernie, Bruce A., Spada, Marcantonio M.·2008·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Procrastination can have deleterious effects on well-being. Despite this, little is known about cognitive-attentional processes involved in procrastination. In this study, 12 individuals self-reporting problematic procrastination were assessed using a semi-structured interview to investigate: (1) whether they held positive and/or negative metacognitive beliefs about procrastination; (2) what was their main goal in procrastinating, and how they knew if they had achieved their goal; (3) how they directed their focus of attention when procrastinating; and (4) what they perceived the advantages and disadvantages of these attentional strategies to be. Results indicated that participants endorsed both positive and negative metacognitive beliefs about procrastination, and that the goal of procrastination was to regulate cognition and negative affect. Participants reported that they either did not know how to determine if they had achieved their goal or that an improvement in mood would signal the goal was achieved. Participants also reported that the principal object of their attentional focus when procrastinating was their emotional state. All participants were able to identify disadvantages to their attentional strategies, whilst nine participants described perceived advantages. The implications of the findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s135246580800413x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that low psychological well-being predicts passive procrastination is consistent with past research indicating that procrastination due to time pressure creates higher stress, self-critical thoughts and negative self-judgments, and that traditional (passive) procrastinators tend to have negative metacognitive beliefs indicative of low psychological well-being.

    “This finding is consistent with past research which indicates that the tendency to procrastinate due to time pressure ultimately creates higher levels of stress, self-critical thoughts and negative self-judgments (Sirois & Tosti, 2012) and other research demonstrating that traditional (passive) procrastinators tend to have negative metacognitive beliefs, indicative of low psychological well-being”
  • Positive metacognitive beliefs are said to improve academic confidence, thus reducing procrastination (Fernie & Spada, 2008).

    “Positive metacognitive beliefs (Fernie & Spada, 2008) are said to improve academic confidence (self-confidence and efficacy beliefs), thus reducing procrastination.”
  • The relationship between procrastination and psychological well-being is cyclic, with low psychological well-being increasing the likelihood of procrastination but increased procrastination then decreasing psychological well-being (Fernie & Spada, 2008).

    “These empirical findings indicated that the relationship between procrastination and psychological well-being is also cyclic, with low psychological well-being, including cognitive processes, increasing the likelihood of procrastination but increased procrastination then decreasing psychological well-being (Fernie & Spada, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernie, B. A., & Spada, M. M.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • University of Roehampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Spada, Marcantonio M.
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2008-02-13
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
359-364
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2119697193
Cited by
43
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
procrastination, metacognitive beliefs, attentional strategies, emotion regulation, negative affect, goal achievement, self-regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review