Using an evidence-based methodology to identify the competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety disorders..
Abstract
Abstract A number of developments make the formal specification of competences in CBT both timely and relevant, in particular the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme, the increasing focus on process and therapist variables in determining outcome, and the increasing diversity of CBT. This paper outlines the development of an evidence-based methodology for determining both a model and a framework for CBT competences, and considers issues related to the implementation of the framework.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A total of 24 feature categories were defined, informed by the CBT competences framework and the Revised Cognitive Therapy Scale.
“We defined a total of 24 feature categories (Box), informed by the CBT competences framework18 and the Revised Cognitive Therapy Scale.23”
From Quantifying the association between psychotherapy content and clinical outcomes using deep learning (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 260
- Authors
- Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Anthony D.
- Venue
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-02-29
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-147
- ISSN
- 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1833
- OpenAlex
- W1987774692
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, therapist competence, depression, anxiety disorders, Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, process parameters, therapist variables, psychotherapy outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
