Cited by 57Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Bulimia Nervosa and Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified: Translation from Randomized Controlled Trial to a Clinical Setting

Open access
Knott, Sarah, Woodward, Debbie, Hoefkens, Antonia, Limbert, Caroline·2015·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background Enhanced Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT-E) (Fairburn, Cooper and Shafran, 2003) was developed as a treatment approach for eating disorders focusing on both core psychopathology and additional maintenance mechanisms. Aims To evaluate treatment outcomes associated with CBT-E in a NHS Eating Disorders Service for adults with bulimia and atypical eating disorders and to make comparisons with a previously published randomized controlled trial (Fairburn et al., 2009) and "real world" evaluation (Byrne, Fursland, Allen and Watson, 2011). Method Participants were referred to the eating disorder service between 2002 and 2011. They were aged between 18-65 years, registered with a General Practitioner within the catchment area, and had experienced symptoms fulfilling criteria for BN or EDNOS for a minimum of 6 months. Results CBT-E was commenced by 272 patients, with 135 completing treatment. Overall, treatment was associated with significant improvements in eating disorder and associated psychopathology, for both treatment completers and the intention to treat sample. Conclusions Findings support dissemination of CBT-E in this context, with significant improvements in eating disorder psychopathology. Improvements to global EDE-Q scores were higher for treatment completers and lower for the intention to treat sample, compared to previous studies (Fairburn et al., 2009; Byrne et al., 2011). Level of attrition was found at 40.8% and non-completion of treatment was associated…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465814000393

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 57

Authors
Knott, S., Woodward, D., Hoefkens, A., & Limbert, C.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB)
Corresponding author
Limbert, Caroline
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2014-10-21
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
641-654
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2163850218
Cited by
57
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
bulimia nervosa, eating disorder not otherwise specified, treatment outcomes, real-world evaluation, treatment discontinuation, anxiety, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, dissemination of psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Bulimia Nervosa, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review