Cited by 154Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Comparison of neuropsychological functioning in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia

Pachana, Nancy Ann, Boone, Kyle Brauer, Miller, Bruce L., Cummings, Jeffrey L., Berman, Nancy·1996·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Neuropsychological changes distinguishing mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) from frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have been described, but empirical verification of differential cognitive characteristics is lacking. Archival neuropsychological data on 15 FTD patients, 16 AD patients, and 16 controls were compared. Controls outperformed both patient groups on measures of verbal and nonverbal memory, executive ability, and constructional skill, with AD patients showing more widespread memory decline. No differences were found between the 3 groups in confrontation naming, recognition memory, or basic attention. Patient groups differed only in nonverbal memory, with FTD patients performing significantly better than AD patients. However, patient groups also differed in pattern of performance across executive and memory domains. Specifically, AD patients exhibited significantly greater impairment on memory than executive tasks, whereas the opposite pattern characterized the FTD group. These findings suggest that examination of relative rankings of scores across cognitive domains, in addition to interpretation of individual neuropsychological scores, may be useful in differential diagnosis of FTD versus AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617700001673

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Executive dysfunction is not always the most prominent deficit in bvFTD and may not even be present on formal neuropsychological test results in the early stages.

    “Contrary to popular belief, executive dysfunction is not always the most prominent deficit in bvFTD and may not even be present on formal neuropsychological test results in the early stages (Pachana et al. , 1996; Kipps et al. , 2008; Rascovsky et al. , 2011).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 154

Authors
Pachana, N. A., Boone, K. B., Miller, B. L., Cummings, J. L., & Berman, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
1996-11
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
505-510
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W1963538608
Cited by
154
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 10123, P30AG010123)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000425, M01-RR00425)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, differential diagnosis, neuropsychological assessment, memory impairment, executive function, nonverbal memory, verbal memory, constructional ability, confrontation naming, recognition memory, attention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review