Cited by 15Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Long-term levels of LDL-C and cognitive function: the CARDIA study

Open access
Mefford, Matthew T., Chen, Ligong, Lewis, Cora E., Muntner, Paul, Sidney, Stephen, Launer, Lenore J., Monda, Keri L., Ruzza, Andrea +3 more·2021·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Objectives: It is uncertain if long-term levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) affect cognition in middle age. We examined the association of LDL-C levels over 25 years with cognitive function in a prospective cohort of black and white US adults. Methods: Lipids were measured at baseline (1985–1986; age: 18–30 years) and at serial examinations conducted over 25 years. Time-averaged cumulative LDL-C was calculated using the area under the curve for 3,328 participants with ≥3 LDL-C measurements and a cognitive function assessment. Cognitive function was assessed at the Year 25 examination with the Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST], Rey Auditory Visual Learning Test [RAVLT], and Stroop Test. A brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sub-study (N = 707) was also completed at Year 25 to assess abnormal white matter tissue volume (AWMV) and gray matter cerebral blood flow volume (GM-CBFV) as secondary outcomes. Results: There were 15.6%, 32.9%, 28.9%, and 22.6% participants with time-averaged cumulative LDL-C <100 mg/dL, 101–129 mg/dL, 130–159 mg/dL, and ≥160 mg/dL, respectively. Standardized differences in all cognitive function test scores ranged from 0.16 SD lower to 0.09 SD higher across time-averaged LDL-C categories in comparison to those with LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. After covariate adjustment, participants with higher versus lower time-averaged LDL-C had a lower RAVLT score (p-trend = 0.02) but no differences were present for DSST, Stroop Test, AWMV, or GM-CBFV. Conclusion: Cumulative LDL-C was associated with small differences in memory, as assessed by RAVLT scores, but not other cognitive or brain MRI measures over 25 years of follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617721000059

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 15

Authors
Mefford, M. T., Chen, L., Lewis, C. E., Muntner, P., Sidney, S., Launer, L. J., Monda, K. L., Ruzza, A., Kassahun, H., Rosenson, R. S., & Carson, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Carson, April P.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2021-02-10
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
1048-1057
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W3129188033
Cited by
15
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Northwestern University (HHSN268201800005I, HHSN268201800007I, HHSN268201800004I, AG0005)
  • University of Minnesota (AG0005, HHSN268201800005I, HHSN268201800004I, HHSN268201800007I)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (HHSN268201800004I, HHSN268201800005I, AG0005, HHSN268201800007I)
  • University of Alabama (HHSN268201800004I, HHSN268201800007I, HHSN268201800005I)
  • Kaiser Foundation Research Institute (HHSN268201800007I, HHSN268201800005I, AG0005, HHSN268201800004I)
  • National Institute on Aging (NHLBI (AG0005, HHSN268201800007I, HHSN268201800005I, AG 0005, HHSN268201800004I)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201800004I, HHSN268201800005I, HHSN268201300026C, HHS-N2-68201300025C, HHSN268201800006I, HHSN268201800007I, HHSN268201800003I, AG0005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
LDL cholesterol, cognitive function, memory, middle age (human life stage), area under the curve, brain MRI, CARDIA cohort
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, Stroop Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review