Cited by 169Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLatin American rural developmentAgricultural economics and policies

‘Economic analysis of deforestation in Mexico’

Barbier, Edward B., Burgess, Joanne C.·1996·Environment and Development Economics

Abstract

This paper uses panel analyses to estimate relationships for agricultural planted area and beef cattle numbers at the state level in Mexico during the period 1970–85, in order to determine the main factors affecting forest land conversion. Of the key policy variables, maize and fertilizer prices appear to be the main influences on the expansion of planted area, whereas beef prices and credit disbursement influence cattle numbers. Population growth also affects both livestock and agricultural activities, and income per capita is positively correlated with cattle expansion. These estimated relationships are used to examine the effects both of agricultural and livestock sectoral policy changes and of trade liberalization in Mexico resulting from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). To avoid any unintended impacts of NAFTA on deforestation, it may be necessary for Mexico to make complementary investments in land improvements, especially for existing cultivation on rainfed land.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355770x00000590

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barbier and Burgess (1996) perform a similar exercise for Mexico.

    “while Barbier and Burgess (1996) perform a similar exercise for Mexico.”

    From The Effect of Rural Credit on Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon (2020) · cites this paper as Barbier and Burgess (1996)

  • We include controls for agricultural commodity prices, which have been shown to be drivers of deforestation.

    “First, we include controls for agricultural commodity prices, which have been shown to be drivers of deforestation (Panayotou and Sungsuwan, 1994; Barbier and Burgess, 1996; Angelsen and Kaimowitz, 1999; Assunc ¸ão et al., 2015).”

    From The Effect of Rural Credit on Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon (2020) · cites this paper as Barbier and Burgess, 1996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Venue
Environment and Development Economics
Published
1996-05
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
203-239
ISSN
  • 1355-770X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4395
OpenAlex
W2789132099
Cited by
169
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environment and Development Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
deforestation, forest conversion, beef cattle, corn prices, fertilizer prices, beef prices, agricultural credit, population growth, per capita income, agricultural policy, livestock policy, trade liberalization, NAFTA, rainfed agriculture, land improvement, Mexico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review