The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biodiversity and nature-based tourism at forest reserves in Uganda
Abstract
The benefits of nature-based tourism to biodiversity conservation are often presumed but rarely quantified. The relative value placed on attributes of nature parks is unknown, as is the contribution of biodiversity to tourists' willingness to visit a particular protected area. We surveyed tourists and foreign residents in Uganda to determine how preferences for particular protected areas are formed. We evaluated tourists' demand for elevated biodiversity levels (increased numbers of bird species seen), relative to other protected areas attributes. As the number of bird species increased, tourists demonstrated increased willingness to visit a protected area, independently of all other factors. We used these results to evaluate a revenue-maximizing park management strategy, and consider how revenues from nature-based tourism compare with those from local agricultural land-uses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait, J. D., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 4,595
Self-citationMixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level
Revelt, D., & Train, K. E. (1998) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465398557735 · Cited by 2,171
The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice
Hensher, D. A., & Greene, W. H. (2003) · Transportation · doi:10.1023/a:1022558715350 · Cited by 2,047
Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities
Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1994) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1017 · Cited by 1,474
Self-citationEconomic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature
Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R. E., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1073947 · Cited by 1,454
Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/3180269 · Cited by 1,415
Self-citationRecreation Demand Models with Taste Differences over People
Train, K. E. (1998) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3147053 · Cited by 1,048
Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest
Peters, C. M., Gentry, A. H., & Mendelsohn, R. O. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/339655a0 · Cited by 828
Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis
Loomis, J. B., & White, D. S. (1996) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/0921-8009(96)00029-8 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- NAIDOO, R., & ADAMOWICZ, W. L.
- Venue
- Environment and Development Economics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-03-17
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-178
- ISSN
- 1355-770X
- 1469-4395
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 44
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodiversity and nature-based tourism at forest reserves in Uganda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355770x0400186x
- The paper
- NAIDOO, R., & ADAMOWICZ, W. L. (2005). Biodiversity and nature-based tourism at forest reserves in Uganda. Environment and Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x0400186x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
