Poverty, development, and environment
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the complex relationship that exists between poverty and natural resource degradation in developing countries. The rural poor are often concentrated in fragile, or less favorable, environmental areas. Consequently, their livelihoods can be intimately dependent on natural resource use and ecosystem services. The relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation may depend on a complex range of choices and tradeoffs available to the poor, which in the absence of capital, labor, and land markets, is affected by their access to outside employment and any natural resource endowments. The paper develops a poverty–environment model to characterize some of these linkages, and concludes by discussing policy implications and avenues for further research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High dependence on natural resource extraction by the poor is often associated with asset poverty and lack of access to key markets.
“High dependence on natural resource extraction by the poor is often associated with asset poverty and lack of access to key markets (Barbier, 2010).”
From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Barbier, 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis
Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N. J., Bauch, S., Börner, J., Smith-Hall, C., & Wunder, S. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
- Authors
- BARBIER, E. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Corresponding author
- BARBIER, EDWARD B.
- ORCID
- BARBIER, EDWARD B.
- Venue
- Environment and Development Economics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-10-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 635-660
- ISSN
- 1355-770X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4395
- OpenAlex
- W2114744296
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Environment and Development Economics (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
- Keywords
- natural resource degradation, rural poverty, ecosystem services, livelihoods, fragile ecosystems, natural resource endowment, off-farm employment, developing countries, environmental policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review