Cited by 47Music Technology and Sound StudiesSound Studies and AuralityArt, Technology, and Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Beyond DIY in Electronic Music

Richards, John·2013·Organised Sound

Abstract

Do-it-yourself (DIY) in electronic music represents a new paradigm that is not just about DIY. Doing-it-together (DIT) and the idea of community and shared experiences are at the root of DIY practice. This article discusses how the workshop and the event have become central to practitioners working in the field of DIY. Collective instrument building, the concept of the living installation, and performance are viewed as a holistic event. Some specific examples of the author's work known as Dirty Electronics are considered, where emphasis is placed upon experience rather than the ‘something to take home’ factor. These include the following works: ICA Solder a Score, Noise Shadow, Still and Cut & Thrust. Composing ‘outside’ electronics is regarded as a method for revealing processes that can be represented in other areas of the work beyond sound-generating circuits. The article also looks at how building circuits and sound devices acts as a way to create a tabula rasa, and how the idea of delegated performance, where instruments are played by ‘non-experts’, serves to establish a naïve approach and authenticity in performance. Through the sharing of information online and in workshops, the DIY community has become knowledgeable, which has resulted in a community ‘full of experts’ and the growth of custom-designed circuits. The rise of discrete hand-held music players, such as the Buddha Machine, and the boutique synthesiser are also discussed, and the physical artefact and sound object are seen as a vehicle for the dissemination of ideas. Finally, the question is asked: ‘In DIY practice, where does the authentic document of the work lie?’

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355771813000241

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 47

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1193 · DOI
  2. Bourriaud, 2002, Relational Aesthetics
  3. Turkle, 2007, Evocative Objects: Things We Think With
  4. Shaughnessy, 2008, Cover Art By: New Music Graphics
  5. Negroponte, 1995, Being Digital
  6. Bishop, 2011, Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship
  7. Collins, 2006, Handmade Electronic Music: The Art of Hardware Hacking
  8. Bausch, 2007, Kontakthof with Ladies and Gentlemen Over ‘65’
  9. 10.1093/earlyj/11.2.164 · DOI
  10. Bowers J. , Archer P. 2005. Not Hyper, Not Meta, Not Cyber but Infra-Instruments. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME05), Vancouver, 5–10.
  11. 10.1017/S1355771813000228 · DOI
  12. 10.1017/S1355771813000253 · DOI
  13. Lévi-Strauss, 1966, The Savage Mind
  14. Reich, 1974, Writings About Music
  15. Richards, 2011, Lead and Schemas, Roland: ICA Magazine, 9, 23
  16. Shaughnessy, 2003, Radical Album Cover Art: Sampler 3
  17. Spencer, 2005, DIY: The Rise of Lo-Fi Culture
  18. Toffler, 1970, Future Shock
  19. Wagstaff, 2007, The Anti-iPod: The Buddha Machine Shows that Bells and Whistles Aren't Always Better, The Wall Street Journal
  20. Tilbury, 2008, Cornelius Cardew (1936–1981): A Life Unfinished
  21. Cage, 1981, For the Birds: John Cage in Conversation with Daniel Charles
  22. Richards, 2012, Collateral Damage, The Wire: Adventures in Modern Music, 338
  23. Boon, 2006, FM3, The Wire: Adventures in Modern Music, 269, 12
  24. Bishop, 2006, Participation
  25. Lippit T. 2004. Realtime Sampling System for the Turntablist Version 2: 16padjoystickcontroller. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME04), Hamamatsu, 211–12.
  26. Hassenzahl, 2013, The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction

Metadata

Authors
Richards, J.
Affiliations
De Montfort University (GB)
Corresponding author
Richards, John
Venue
Organised Sound
Published
2013-11-12
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
274-281
ISSN
  • 1355-7718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8153
OpenAlex
W2154051027
Cited by
47
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organised Sound (publishedVersion)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Sound Studies and Aurality
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
Keywords
sound objects, music workshops, authenticity in performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond DIY in Electronic Music. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355771813000241
The paper
Richards, J. (2013). Beyond DIY in Electronic Music. Organised Sound. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355771813000241