Cited by 240Language Development and DisordersSpanish Linguistics and Language StudiesSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers

MONTRUL, SILVINA, BOWLES, MELISSA·2009·Bilingualism: Language and Cognition

Abstract

The obligatory use of the preposition a with animate, specific direct objects in Spanish (Juan conoce a María “Juan knows Maria”) is a well-known instance of Differential Object Marking (DOM; Torrego, 1998; Leonetti, 2004). Recent studies have documented the loss and/or incomplete acquisition of several grammatical features in Spanish heritage speakers (Silva-Corvalán, 1994; Montrul, 2002), including DOM (Montrul, 2004a). This study assesses the extent of incomplete knowledge of DOM in Spanish heritage speakers raised in the United States by comparing it with knowledge of DOM in fully competent native speakers. Experiment 1 examined whether omission of a affected grammatical competence, as measured by the linguistic behavior of 67 heritage speakers and 22 monolingual speakers in an oral production task and in a written acceptability judgment task. Experiment 2 followed up on the results of the acceptability judgment task with 13 monolingual speakers and 69 heritage speakers, and examined whether problems with DOM generalize to other instances of structural and inherent dative case, including ditransitive verbs and gustar-type psychological verbs. Results of the two experiments confirmed that heritage speakers' recognition and production of DOM is probabilistic, even for speakers with advanced proficiency in Spanish. This suggests that many heritage speakers' grammars may not actually instantiate inherent case. We argue that language loss under reduced input conditions in childhood is, in this case, like “going back to basics”: it leads to simplification of the grammar by letting go of the non-core options, while retaining the core functional structure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1366728909990071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another characteristic of heritage Spanish is variation in the differential object marker.

    “Another characteristic of heritage Spanish is the variation in the differential object marker (Montrul & Bowles, 2009;Callen, 2025), which usually marks animate, specific direct objects (e.g., la chica but not la mesa).”

    From Sounds Like Politics: Cardi B and the Discourse of Español Ratatá (2026) · cites this paper as Montrul & Bowles, 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MONTRUL, S., & BOWLES, M.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
MONTRUL, SILVINA
Venue
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
Published
2009-07
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
363-383
ISSN
  • 1366-7289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1841
OpenAlex
W2170351589
Cited by
240
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
15.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bilingualism Language and Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Keywords
differential object marking, Spanish heritage speakers, preposition a, dative alternation, grammatical competence, grammatical simplification, language loss, grammar learning, dative case, ditransitive verbs, bilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review