The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant breeding to control zinc deficiency in India: how cost-effective is biofortification?
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To estimate the potential impact of zinc biofortification of rice and wheat on public health in India and to evaluate its cost-effectiveness compared with alternative interventions and international standards. Design: The burden of zinc deficiency (ZnD) in India was expressed in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost. Current zinc intakes were derived from a nationally representative household food consumption survey (30-day recall) and attributed to household members based on adult equivalent weights. Using a dose–response function, projected increased zinc intakes from biofortified rice and wheat were translated into potential health improvements for pessimistic and optimistic scenarios. After estimating the costs of developing and disseminating the new varieties, the cost-effectiveness of zinc biofortification was calculated for both scenarios and compared with alternative micronutrient interventions and international reference standards. Setting: India. Subjects: Representative household survey (n = 119 554). Results: The calculated annual burden of ZnD in India is 2.8 million DALYs lost. Zinc biofortification of rice and wheat may reduce this burden by 20–51% and save 0.6–1.4 million DALYs each year, depending on the scenario. The cost for saving one DALY amounts to $US 0.73–7.31, which is very cost-effective by standards of the World Bank and the World Health Organization, and is lower than that of most other micronutrient interventions. Conclusions: Not only may zinc biofortification save lives and prevent morbidity among millions of people, it may also help accommodate the need to economise and to allocate resources more efficiently. Further research is needed to corroborate these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bhutta, Z. A., Black, R. E., Brown, K. H., Gardner, J. M., Gore, S., Hidayat, A., Khatun, F., Martorell, R., Ninh, N. X., Penny, M. E., et al. (1999) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70086-7 · Cited by 731
Self-citation
Cited by
White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x · Cited by 2,178
Zinc in soils, water and food crops
Noulas, C., Tziouvalekas, M., & Karyotis, T. (2018) · Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.02.009 · Cited by 525
Biofortified crops to alleviate micronutrient malnutrition
Mayer, J. E., Pfeiffer, W. H., & Beyer, P. (2008) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.01.007 · Cited by 499
Elemike, E. E., Uzoh, I. M., Onwudiwe, D. C., & Babalola, O. O. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9030499 · Cited by 499
Global impacts of human mineral malnutrition
Stein, A. J. (2010) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0228-2 · Cited by 375
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stein, A. J., Nestel, P., Meenakshi, J., Qaim, M., Sachdev, H., & Bhutta, Z. A.
- Venue
- Public Health Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 492-501
- ISSN
- 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2727
- OpenAlex
- W2142881185
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant breeding to control zinc deficiency in India: how cost-effective is biofortification? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1368980007223857
- The paper
- Stein, A. J., Nestel, P., Meenakshi, J., Qaim, M., Sachdev, H., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2007). Plant breeding to control zinc deficiency in India: how cost-effective is biofortification? Public Health Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980007223857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.