Cited by 52Iron Metabolism and DisordersMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareNutrition and Health Studies

Iron supplement use among Danish pregnant women

Open access
Knudsen, Vibeke K, Hansen, Harald S, Ovesen, Lars, Mikkelsen, Tina B, Olsen, Sjurður F·2007·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate compliance with the national recommendation on supplemental iron to all pregnant women in Denmark and to explore differences between compliers and non-compliers with respect to dietary habits and other lifestyle factors. Design: Intake of supplemental iron from pure iron supplements and from multivitamin and mineral preparations was estimated in mid-pregnancy. Setting: Nationwide cohort study, the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), comprising more than 100 000 women recruited in early pregnancy. Subjects: Information on diet and dietary supplements was available for 54 371 women. Of these, information on lifestyle factors was available for 50 902 women. Results: A high compliance with the recommendation was found, as approximately 77% of the women reported use of iron supplements during pregnancy. However, many of the compliers did not obtain the recommended doses of iron, which can partly be explained by the lack of iron preparations of appropriate doses available on the Danish market. Compliance with the recommendation was associated with age above 20 years, primiparity, body mass index < 30 kg m− 2, non-smoking and long education. No major differences were seen in dietary intake between compliers and non-compliers. Conclusion: Overall, a high compliance rate was found among participants of the DNBC but a clarification on daily dose is needed, and more concern should be paid to vulnerable groups such as young, smoking women and women with no or short education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s136898000769956x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knudsen, V. K., Hansen, H. S., Ovesen, L., Mikkelsen, T. B., & Olsen, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
  • Hjerteforeningen (DK)
Corresponding author
Knudsen, Vibeke K
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2007-10
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
1104-1110
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W1980972554
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • March of Dimes Foundation
  • European Commission
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
  • Augustinus Fonden
  • Egmont Fonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
iron supplementation, pregnancy, supplement use, multivitamin and mineral supplements, iron intake, lifestyle factors, primiparity, body mass index, smoking, educational attainment, Danish National Birth Cohort
MeSH terms
Adult, Denmark, Diet, Diet Surveys, Female, Humans, Iron, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review