Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 543

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are Asians at greater mortality risks for being overweight than Caucasians? Redefining obesity for Asians

Open access
Wen, Chi Pang, David Cheng, Ting Yuan, Tsai, Shan Pou, Chan, Hui Ting, Hsu, Hui Ling, Hsu, Chih Cheng, Eriksen, Michael P·2009·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether overweight Asians, assessed on the basis of WHO criteria, are at greater mortality risk than overweight Caucasians, and to determine whether alternative cut-off points (BMI = 23·0–24·9 kg/m 2 for overweight and BMI ≥ 25·0 kg/m 2 for obesity) suggested by the WHO Western Pacific Regional Office are appropriate. Design: The cohort was followed prospectively until the end of 2001. All-cause and CVD mortality risks of the overweight and obese group, relative to the reference group (BMI = 18·5–24·9 or 18·5–22·9 kg/m 2), were assessed using Cox regression analysis, adjusting for age, smoking and gender. Excess deaths were estimated with a method proposed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Setting: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS 2001) and a middle-aged perspective cohort in Taiwan. Subjects: Subjects comprised 36 386 civil servants and school teachers, aged 40 years and older, who underwent a medical examination during 1989–1992. Results: In the WHO-defined overweight group, Asians showed a significant increase in all-cause mortality risk compared with Caucasians. Asians showed risks equivalent to Caucasians’ at lower BMI (around 5 units). Every unit of BMI increase, at 25·0 kg/m 2 or above, was associated with a 9 % increase in relative mortality risk from all causes. Applying a cut-off point of 25·0 kg/m 2 for obesity would result a prevalence of 27·1 %, while the traditional WHO cut-off point of 30·0 kg/m 2 yielded obesity prevalence of 4·1 %. Excess deaths due to obesity accounted for 8·6 % of all deaths and 21·1 % of CVD deaths, based on the alternative cut-offs. Conclusions: In this Asian population, significant mortality risks started at BMI ≥ 25·0 kg/m 2, rather than at BMI ≥ 30·0 kg/m 2. The study supports the use of BMI ≥ 25·0 kg/m 2 as a new cut-off point for obesity and BMI = 23·0–24·9 kg/m 2 for overweight. The magnitude of obesity-attributable deaths has been hitherto under-appreciated among Asians.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980008002802

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 543

Metadata

Authors
Wen, C. P., David Cheng, T. Y., Tsai, S. P., Chan, H. T., Hsu, H. L., Hsu, C. C., & Eriksen, M. P.
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2009-04
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
497-506
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2158906537
Cited by
543
References
46
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Asians at greater mortality risks for being overweight than Caucasians? Redefining obesity for Asians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1368980008002802
The paper
Wen, C. P., David Cheng, T. Y., Tsai, S. P., Chan, H. T., Hsu, H. L., Hsu, C. C., & Eriksen, M. P. (2009). Are Asians at greater mortality risks for being overweight than Caucasians? Redefining obesity for Asians. Public Health Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980008002802

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.