The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems: a methodological review
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Through a literature review, we investigated the geographic information systems (GIS) methods used to define the food environment and the types of spatial measurements they generate. Design: Review study. Setting: Searches were conducted in health science databases, including Medline/Pubmed, PsycINFO, Francis and GeoBase. We included studies using GIS-based measures of the food environment published up to 1 June 2008. Results: Twenty-nine papers were included. Two different spatial approaches were identified. The density approach quantifies the availability of food outlets using the buffer method, kernel density estimation or spatial clustering. The proximity approach assesses the distance to food outlets by measuring distances or travel times. GIS network analysis tools enable the modelling of travel time between referent addresses (home) and food outlets for a given transportation network and mode, and the assumption of travel routing behaviours. Numerous studies combined both approaches to compare food outlet spatial accessibility between different types of neighbourhoods or to investigate relationships between characteristics of the food environment and individual food behaviour. Conclusions: GIS methods provide new approaches for assessing the food environment by modelling spatial accessibility to food outlets. On the basis of the available literature, it appears that only some GIS methods have been used, while other GIS methods combining availability and proximity, such as spatial interaction models, have not yet been applied to this field. Future research would also benefit from a combination of GIS methods with survey approaches to describe both spatial and social food outlet accessibility as important determinants of individual food behaviours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Concept of Access: Definition and Relationship to Consumer Satisfaction
Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001 · Cited by 3,437
GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis
Anselin, L., Syabri, I., & Kho, Y. (2006) · Geographical Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00671.x · Cited by 2,555
Creating Healthy Food and Eating Environments: Policy and Environmental Approaches
Story, M., Kaphingst, K. M., Robinson-O'Brien, R., & Glanz, K. (2008) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926 · Cited by 2,365
Environmental Contributions to the Obesity Epidemic
Hill, J. O., & Peters, J. C. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5368.1371 · Cited by 2,222
Larson, N. I., Story, M. T., & Nelson, M. C. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.025 · Cited by 2,003
Interactive Spatial Data Analysis
Bailey, T., & Gatrell, A. C. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,945
Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars
Frank, L. D., Andresen, M. A., & Schmid, T. L. (2004) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.011 · Cited by 1,735
Geographic information systems and science
(2011) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2011.582276 · Cited by 1,691
Spatial disease clusters: Detection and inference
Kulldorff, M., & Nagarwalla, N. (1995) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780140809 · Cited by 1,599
Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges
Guagliardo, M. F. (2004) · International Journal of Health Geographics · doi:10.1186/1476-072x-3-3 · Cited by 1,533
Cited by
The local food environment and diet: a systematic review
Caspi, C. E., Sorensen, G., Subramanian, S. V., & Kawachi, I. (2012) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.006 · Cited by 1,404
Systems Science Methods in Public Health: Dynamics, Networks, and Agents
Luke, D. A., & Stamatakis, K. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101222 · Cited by 710
Downs, S. M., Ahmed, S., Fanzo, J., & Herforth, A. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9040532 · Cited by 466
Wolch, J., Jerrett, M., Reynolds, K., McConnell, R., Chang, R., Dahmann, N., Brady, K., Gilliland, F., Su, J. G., & Berhane, K. (2011) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.10.001 · Cited by 374
An Interactive Mapping Tool to Assess Individual Mobility Patterns in Neighborhood Studies
Chaix, B., Kestens, Y., Perchoux, C., Karusisi, N., Merlo, J., & Labadi, K. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.026 · Cited by 289
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Charreire, H., Casey, R., Salze, P., Simon, C., Chaix, B., Banos, A., Badariotti, D., Weber, C., & Oppert, J.-M.
- Venue
- Public Health Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-04-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1773-1785
- ISSN
- 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2727
- OpenAlex
- W2137054915
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 50.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems: a methodological review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1368980010000753
- The paper
- Charreire, H., Casey, R., Salze, P., Simon, C., Chaix, B., Banos, A., Badariotti, D., Weber, C., & Oppert, J.-M. (2010). Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems: a methodological review. Public Health Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980010000753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.