The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How effective is food industry self-substantiation of food–health relationships underpinning health claims on food labels in Australia?
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The Food Standards Code regulates health claims on Australian food labels. General-level health claims highlight food–health relationships, e.g. ‘contains calcium for strong bones’. Food companies making claims must notify Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) and certify that a systematic literature review (SLR) substantiating the food–health relationship has been conducted. There is no pre- or post-notification assessment of the SLR, potentially enabling the food industry to make claims based on poor-quality research. The present study assessed the rigour of self-substantiation. Design: Food–health relationships notified to FSANZ were monitored monthly between 2013 and 2017. These relationships were assessed by scoping published literature. Where evidence was equivocal/insufficient, the relevant government food regulatory agency was asked to investigate. If not investigated, or the response was unsatisfactory, the project team conducted an independent SLR which was provided to the government agency. Setting: Australia. Participants: Self-substantiated food–health relationships. Results: There were sixty-seven relationships notified by thirty-eight food companies. Of these, thirty-three relationships (52 %) from twenty companies were deemed to have sufficient published evidence. Four were excluded as they originated in New Zealand. Three relationships were removed before investigations were initiated. The project initiated twenty-seven food–health relationship investigations. Another six relationships were withdrawn, and three relationships were awaiting government assessment. Conclusions: To ensure that SLR underpinning food–health relationships are rigorous and reduce regulatory enforcement burden, pre-market approval of food–health relationships should be introduced. This will increase consumer and public health confidence in the regulatory process and prevent potentially misleading general-level health claims on food labels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GLHC can be either preapproved or self-substantiated by the specific company using the claim, but the rigor of the self-substantiation process has been questioned.
“These can be either preapproved or selfsubstantiated by the specific company using the claim, but the rigor of the self-substantiation process has been questioned (Wellard-Cole, Watson, Hughes, & Chapman, 2019).”
From Comparison of requirements for using health claims on foods in the European Union, the USA, Canada, and Australia/New Zealand (2021) · cites this paper as Wellard-Cole, Watson, Hughes, & Chapman, 2019
The introductory passages under Abstract state that companies can self-substantiate food–health relationships for general-level health claims, and the paper questions the rigour of that process. They do not establish that general-level health claims can alternatively be preapproved; the paper explicitly describes preapproval as a requirement for high-level health claims. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn Australia and New Zealand, notified claims are placed on the website without a checking process, and the rigor of the self-substantiation process has been questioned.
“It should be mentioned that notified claims are placed on the website without a checking process and that the rigor of the self-substantiation process has been questioned (Wellard-Cole et al., 2019).”
From Comparison of requirements for using health claims on foods in the European Union, the USA, Canada, and Australia/New Zealand (2021) · cites this paper as Wellard-Cole et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 2007, Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context, 43
- 2017, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, MR000033
- 2009, Guidance Document for Preparing a Submission for Food Health Claims
- 2016, Information on Establishing Food-Health Relationships for General Level Health Claims
- 1995, Code of Practice Nutrient Claims in Food Labels and in Advertisements
- 2017, Summary of Submissions – Proposal P1024 Revision of the Regulation of Nutritive Substances and Novel Foods
- 2017, Consultation Paper – Proposal P1024 Revision of the Regulation of Nutritive Substances and Novel Foods
- 2014, Consumption Patterns and Food Demand to 2050
- 10.1017/S1368980010003691 · DOI
- 10.1079/PHN2005666 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00382.x · DOI
- 10.1111/obr.12098 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jand.2016.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1111/nure.12140 · DOI
- 10.1177/074391569101000103 · DOI
- 10.5694/mja16.00094 · DOI
- 10.1080/07315724.2016.1248246 · DOI
- 1987, Public Health Rep, 102, 398
- 10.1186/s12966-017-0548-1 · DOI
- 2015, Eur J Public Health, 25, ckv172.102
- 2006, Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 15, 10
- 2013, Australian Dietary Guidelines
- 10.2471/BLT.15.156281 · DOI
- 2012, Health Policy and Systems Research: A Methodology Reader
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001000 · DOI
- 2007, What is Health Policy and Systems Research and Why Does it Matter?
- 10.1017/S1368980013003078 · DOI
- 2010, EFSA J, 8, 1732
- 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2135 · DOI
- 2014, Getting Your Claims Right
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kušar, A., Žmitek, K., Lähteenmäki, L., Raats, M. M., & Pravst, I. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12716 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Wellard-Cole, L., Watson, W. L., Hughes, C., & Chapman, K.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Council NSW (AU)
- Venue
- Public Health Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-03-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 1686-1695
- ISSN
- 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2727
- PMC
- PMC10260819
- OpenAlex
- W2918179927
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Keywords
- health claims, food labels, systematic reviews, food industry, regulatory enforcement, premarket approval, quality of evidence, Australia
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Food Labeling, Government Agencies, Humans, Legislation, Food, New Zealand, Nutritive Value, Public Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review