Cited by 21Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesCultural Identity and HeritageArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

Archaeology, conflict and contemporary identity in the north of Ireland. Implications for theory and practice in comparative archaeologies of colonialism

Horning, Audrey J.·2006·Archaeological Dialogues

Abstract

Current trends in historical archaeology emphasize the centrality of capitalism and colonial discourse in examining commonalities in the archaeologies of fictive worlds such as the British Atlantic. Yet far from informing archaeological practice, overly simplistic incorporation of postcolonial and neo-Marxian approaches in comparative archaeologies can actually impede our ability to disentangle the complexities of the early modern colonial experience in a socially relevant fashion. While the disparate colonial settlements of the Atlantic share a recognizable material culture as physical testament to the overarching impact of European expansion, contemporary implications and memories of colonial entanglements vary wildly. A critical consideration of the role of overtly theoretical approaches in developing a nuanced archaeology of the early modern period in the north of Ireland, where the construction of present-day identities is firmly rooted in dichotomous understandings of the impact of British expansion in the 16th and 17th centuries, raises broader questions about our responsibilities in addressing conflict and in redressing the disjuncture between espousing and practising theoretically informed archaeology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1380203806212091

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A potential problem with the emphasis on creolization is its tendency to mask the violence, conflict, and power differences of the colonial Chesapeake behind a focus on blended material culture, unifying practices, and ethnogenesis.

    “A potential problem inherent in this emphasis on creolization, though, is its tendency to mask the violence, conflict, and differences of power inherent in the colonial Chesapeake behind a focus on blended material culture, unifying practices, and the ethnogenesis of new peoples (Horning 2006b, p. 199).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horning, A. J.
Corresponding author
Horning, Audrey J.
Venue
Archaeological Dialogues
Published
2006-10-11
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
183-200
ISSN
  • 1380-2038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-2294
OpenAlex
W2162676144
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archaeological Dialogues (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Identity and Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
early modern colonialism, north of Ireland, postcolonial archaeology, colonial conflict, contemporary identity, British Atlantic, colonial memory, colonial settlement, European expansion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review