The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Back to the futurist. Response to Dawdy
Abstract
First I will offer a view of public archaeology which differs from Dawdy's perspective. Then I will respond briefly to one of her specific questions. Finally, I will comment on her suggestion for a futurist archaeology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First is the idea of information and communication, which Carol McDavid proposes as a fundamental characteristic of community archaeology, ''it is usually not directed towards scholarly agendas as much as it is focused on creating public spaces for community voices … [to] share ideas and interests common to us as citizens'' (McDavid 2009:166).”
From Inside/Outside, Upside Down: Including Archaeologists in Communities (2011) · cites this paper as McDavid 2009:166
Citations
Cited by
Inside/Outside, Upside Down: Including Archaeologists in Communities
Agbe-Davies, A. S. (2011) · Archaeologies · doi:10.1007/s11759-011-9185-5 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- McDavid, C.
- Venue
- Archaeological Dialogues
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-11-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-169
- ISSN
- 1380-2038
- 1478-2294
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
