CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Race, Genetics, and SocietyPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The strange afterlife of biodeterministic imagination

Battle-Baptiste, Whitney·2020·Archaeological Dialogues
DOI 10.1017/s1380203820000069
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The commentaries debated numerous points in the target article. Many questioned the existence of a crisis and the benefits of a paradigm shift, even though none countered the listed signs of a crisis. Paradigm shifts are an important way that science progresses. There remains hope for a unifying theory, and for a reawakening of an ambitious science of visual attention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1380203820000069

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Related

Metadata

Authors
Battle-Baptiste, W.
Venue
Archaeological Dialogues
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2020-05-15
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
25-27
ISSN
  • 1380-2038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-2294
DOI
10.1017/s1380203820000069
OpenAlex
W3024724020
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
Archaeological Dialogues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Keywords
imagination, archaeology of the future, future archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review