Cited by 11Animal health and immunologyMicrobial infections and disease researchAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology

Control of BRD in large dairy calf populations

Lehenbauer, Terry W.·2014·Animal Health Research Reviews

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in dairy calves. As the number of calves being raised on the dairy farm or at a calf-raising operation has become larger, both opportunity and risk have increased. Opportunities for applying economies of size and scale exist in these large dairy calf populations while meeting specific needs of the dairy calf. BRD control requires effective biosecurity and biocontainment efforts, adequate passive transfer of immunoglobulins, a strategic immunization program, and appropriate diagnostic strategies for ongoing disease surveillance. These components are necessary to achieve an evidence-based approach for preventing and reducing severity of BRD cases. Proper nutrition, housing, and environmental management are important for achieving optimal dairy calf health and performance. Good record keeping and analysis of outcomes are needed to document dairy calf health and performance and to efficiently identify new problems that require attention in these large dairy calf populations. Proper management of calves to prevent and control BRD requires careful planning and follow through to achieve those results but will likely pay big dividends in improved calf health and future productivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s146625231400022x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study utilizing Bayesian estimation concluded that with a cutoff point of one, the sensitivity of clinical respiratory scoring (CRS) was 62.4% (95% CI: 47.9-75.8), and its specificity was 74.1% (95% CI: 64.9-82.8).

    “A study utilizing Bayesian estimation to assess the effectiveness of clinical respiratory scoring (CRS) and lung ultrasound concluded that with a cutoff point of one, the sensitivity of CRS was 62.4% (95% CI: 47.9–75.8), and its specificity was 74.1% (95% CI: 64.9–82.8) [43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehenbauer, T. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Lehenbauer, Terry W.
Venue
Animal Health Research Reviews
Published
2014-11-07
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
184-185
ISSN
  • 1466-2523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2654
OpenAlex
W2082542689
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Health Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Keywords
bovine respiratory disease, dairy calves, disease control, biosecurity, immunization programs, disease surveillance, calf nutrition, record keeping
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Cattle, Dairying, Forms and Records Control, Primary Prevention, Immunization Programs, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex, Animal Nutrition Sciences, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review