Cited by 20Space Science and Extraterrestrial LifePlanetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary Science

Maintenance of permeable habitable subsurface environments by earthquakes and tidal stresses

Sleep, Norman H.·2012·International Journal of Astrobiology

Abstract

Life inhabits the subsurface of the Earth down to depths where temperature precludes it. Similar conditions are likely to exist within the traditional habitable zone for objects between 0.1 Earth mass (Mars) and 10 Earth masses (superearth). Long-term cooling and internal radioactivity maintain surface heat flow on the Earth. These heat sources are comparable and likely to be comparable in general within old rocky planets. Surface heat flow scales with mass divided by surface area and hence with surface gravity. The average absolute habitable subsurface thickness scales inversely with heat flow and gravity. Surface gravity varies by only 0.4 g for Mars to 3.15 g for a superearth. This range is less than the regional variation of heat flow on the Earth. Still ocean-boiling asteroid impacts (if they occur) are more likely to sterilize the thin habitable subsurface of large objects than thick habitable subsurface of small ones. Tectonics self-organizes to maintain subsurface permeability and habitability within both stable and active regions on the Earth. Small earthquakes within stable regions allow sudden mixing of water masses. Large earthquakes at plate boundaries allow surface water to descend to great habitable depths. Seismic shaking near major faults cracks shallow rock forming permeable regolith. Strong tidal strains form a similar porous regolith on small bodies such as Enceladus with weak stellar heating. This regolith may be water-saturated within rocky bodies and thus habitable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1473550412000122

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Late Heavy Bombardment hypothesis is inconsequential for early life because even a sterilizing heat wave would be protected by low thermal conductivity of ocean floor sediments, protecting the deep biosphere.

    “Even supposing the most unlikely event of a sterilizing heat wave through the ocean, the very low thermal conductivity of ocean floor sediments would protect the 'deep biosphere', sparsely populated though it may have been, from heat death (Sleep 2012).”

    From The Emergence of Life (2019) · cites this paper as Sleep 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 20

Authors
Sleep, N. H.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Sleep, Norman H.
Venue
International Journal of Astrobiology
Published
2012-04-16
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
257-268
ISSN
  • 1473-5504 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3006
OpenAlex
W2145402234
Cited by
20
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Southern California Earthquake Center
  • U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
subsurface habitability, subsurface permeability, surface heat flow, surface gravity, asteroid impact, tectonics, earthquakes, tidal stresses, Enceladus, Mars, subsurface ocean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review