Cited by 11Space Science and Extraterrestrial LifeEarth Systems and Cosmic EvolutionCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Fermi's paradox, extraterrestrial life and the future of humanity: a Bayesian analysis

Open access
Verendel, Vilhelm, Häggström, Olle·2017·International Journal of Astrobiology

Abstract

The Great Filter interpretation of Fermi's great silence asserts that Npq is not a very large number, where N is the number of potentially life-supporting planets in the observable universe,p is the probability that a randomly chosen such planet develops intelligent life to the level of present-day human civilization, and q is the conditional probability that it then goes on to develop a technological supercivilization visible all over the observable universe. Evidence suggests that N is huge, which implies that pq is very small. Hanson (1998) and Bostrom (2008) have argued that the discovery of extraterrestrial life would point towards p not being small and therefore a very small q, which can be seen as bad news for humanity's prospects of colonizing the universe. Here we investigate whether a Bayesian analysis supports their argument, and the answer turns out to depend critically on the choice of prior distribution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1473550415000452

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An organism's environment, sensors and actuators, the compulsions an organism labours under, and so forth together specify an arbitrary task.

    “an organism's environment, sensors and actuators, the compulsions an organism labours under (such as hunger and pain) and so forth together specify an arbitrary task.”

    From Compression, The Fermi Paradox and Artificial Super-Intelligence (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Analysis section defines probabilities for the emergence of life and technological civilizations; it does not discuss how an organism’s environment, sensors, actuators, or compulsions specify a task. Searches for the claim’s distinctive wording and for “sensors actuators hunger pain arbitrary task” found no passage addressing that point. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Aldous, D. J. (2012), 'The great filter, branching histories and unlikely events', The Mathematical Scientist 37(1), 55-64.
  2. Bostrom, N. (2002), Anthropic bias: Observation selection effects in science and phi- losophy, Routledge, New York.
  3. Bostrom, N. (2008), 'Where are they? Why I hope the search for extraterrestrial life finds nothing', MIT Technology Review pp. 72-78.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verendel, V., & Häggström, O.
Affiliations
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Verendel, Vilhelm
Venue
International Journal of Astrobiology
Published
2016-01-11
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
14-18
ISSN
  • 1473-5504 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3006
OpenAlex
W1841521469
Cited by
11
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
Fermi paradox, Great Filter, extraterrestrial life, technological civilization, prior distributions, Bayesian analysis, Bostrom, Hanson

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review