The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom‐forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes)
Abstract
Phylogenetic relationships of resupinate Homobasidiomycetes (Corticiaceae s. lat. and others) were studied using ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences from a broad sample of resupinate and nonresupinate taxa. Two datasets were analysed using parsimony, a ‘core’ dataset of 142 species, each of which is represented by four rDNA regions (mitochondrial and nuclear large and small subunits), and a ‘full’ dataset of 656 species, most of which were represented only by nuclear large subunit rDNA sequences. Both datasets were analysed using traditional heuristic methods with bootstrapping, and the full dataset was also analysed with the Parsimony Ratchet, using equal character weights and six‐parameter weighted parsimony. Analyses of both datasets supported monophyly of the eight major clades of Homobasidiomycetes recognised by Hibbett and Thorn, as well as independent lineages corresponding to the Gloeophyllum clade, corticioid clade and Jaapia argillacea. Analyses of the full dataset resolved two additional groups, the athelioid clade and trechisporoid clade (the latter may be nested in the polyporoid clade). Thus, there are at least 12 independent clades of Homobasidiomycetes. Higher‐level relationships among the major clades are not resolved with confidence. Nevertheless, the euagarics clade, bolete clade, athelioid clade and Jaapia argillacea are consistently resolved as a monophyletic group, whereas the cantharelloid clade, gomphoid‐phalloid clade and hymenochaetoid clade are placed at the base of the Homobasidiomycetes, which is consistent with the preponderance of imperforate parenthesomes in those groups. Resupinate forms occur in each of the major clades of Homobasidiomycetes, some of which are composed mostly or exclusively of resupinate forms (athelioid clade, corticioid clade, trechisporoid clade, Jaapia). The largest concentrations of resupinate forms occur in the polyporoid clade, russuloid clade and hymenochaetoid clade. The cantharelloid clade also includes many resupinate forms, including some that have traditionally been regarded as heterobasidiomycetes (Sebacinaceae, Tulasnellales, Ceratobasidiales). The euagarics clade, which is by far the largest clade in the Homobasidiomycetes, has the smallest fraction of resupinate species. Results of the present study are compared with recent phylogenetic analyses, and a table summarising the phylogenetic distribution of resupinate taxa is presented, as well as notes on the ecology of resupinate forms and related Homobasidiomycetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990) · PCR Protocols · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 · Cited by 36,648
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
PCR protocols — A guide to methods and applications
(1990) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(90)90186-a · Cited by 11,781
Vilgalys, R., & Hester, M. (1990) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 · Cited by 5,958
Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit
Liu, Y. J., Whelen, S., & Hall, B. D. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 · Cited by 3,751
Phylogenetics of Seed Plants: An Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences from the Plastid Gene rbcL
Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Olmstead, R. G., Morgan, D., Les, D. H., Mishler, B. D., Duvall, M. R., Price, R. A., Hills, H. G., Qiu, Y.-L., et al. (1993) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/2399846 · Cited by 2,032
The Parsimony Ratchet, a New Method for Rapid Parsimony Analysis
Nixon, K. (1999) · Cladistics · doi:10.1006/clad.1999.0121 · Cited by 1,773
Baroni, T. J., & Singer, R. (1988) · Mycologia · doi:10.2307/3807808 · Cited by 1,241
och Bo Peterson, G. (1972) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1218228 · Cited by 973
ISOLATION OF DNA FROM FUNGAL MYCELIA AND SINGLE SPORES
Lee, S. B., & Taylor, J. W. (1990) · PCR Protocols · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50038-x · Cited by 930
Cited by
A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi
Hibbett, D. S., Binder, M., Bischoff, J. F., Blackwell, M., Cannon, P. F., Eriksson, O. E., Huhndorf, S., James, T., Kirk, P. M., Lücking, R., et al. (2007) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004 · Cited by 2,390
Self-citationFungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Self-citationMajor clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview
Matheny, P. B., Curtis, J. M., Hofstetter, V., Aime, M. C., Moncalvo, J., Ge, Z.-W., Yang, Z.-L., Slot, J. C., Ammirati, J. F., Baroni, T. J., et al. (2006) · Mycologia · doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.982 · Cited by 503
Self-citationHymenochaetaceae (Basidiomycota) in China
Dai, Y.-C. (2010) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-010-0066-9 · Cited by 351
Further advances in orchid mycorrhizal research
Dearnaley, J. D. W. (2007) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-007-0138-1 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Binder, M., Hibbett, D. S., Larsson, K., Larsson, E., Langer, E., & Langer, G.
- Venue
- Systematics and Biodiversity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-157
- ISSN
- 1477-2000 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-0933
- OpenAlex
- W2151018827
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 23.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom‐forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1477200005001623
- The paper
- Binder, M., Hibbett, D. S., Larsson, K., Larsson, E., Langer, E., & Langer, G. (2005). The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom‐forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes). Systematics and Biodiversity. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1477200005001623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.