CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25News Media Framing and Political CommunicationPolicing Practices and PerceptionsJournalism and Media Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

WHOSE LIVES MATTER?: The National Newsworthiness of Police Killing Unarmed Blacks

Simmons, Alicia D.·2017·Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
DOI 10.1017/s1742058x17000212
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigates the characteristics of cases of police killing unarmed Blacks that receive national news coverage. I analyze an original quantitative dataset measuring the parameters of 111 cases occurring between 2013 and 2015, and the amount of coverage they received in six national news outlets. Multivariate models indicate that cases’ national newsworthiness is positively associated with Blacks’ share of the population where the fatal encounter occurred, and the presence of video evidence, peaceful demonstrations, or civil lawsuits. National newsworthiness is negatively associated with encounters that were initiated by a call to police, and those involving decedents who resisted arrest, suffered electroshock injuries, or were impaired by drugs or alcohol. The findings strongly suggest that the most newsworthy cases are those that align with an injustice frame. I discuss the results using theories of newsworthiness, describing how patterns of story availability and story suitability might shape which cases rise to the top of the national agenda. Using the social construction of reality approach, I discuss the implications of the results for how the public understands the empirical nature of police killing unarmed Blacks, and the symbolic meaning of these events.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1742058x17000212

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195391961.001.0001 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/0022427803253800 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2307/798932 · DOI
  4. 10.2105/AJPH.88.10.1510 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/297788 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/107769900107800202 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02716.x · DOI
  8. Pew Research Center (2012). Trends in News Consumption: 1991–2012, In Changing News Landscape, Even Television is Vulnerable. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. <http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/2012%20News%20Consumption%20Report.pdf> (accessed January 8, 2013).
  9. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/001872674700100201 · DOI
  11. Lawrence, 2000, The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police Brutality
  12. Klockars, 1996, Police Violence: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force, 1
  13. Iyengar, 1987, News That Matters: Television and American Opinion
  14. Gans, 2004, Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time
  15. 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.04.006 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/2657322 · DOI
  17. Chermak, 1995, Victims in the News: Crime and the American News Media
  18. 10.1093/sf/77.1.27 · DOI
  19. 10.1525/sp.2010.57.2.269 · DOI
  20. Shaw, 1942, Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas
  21. 10.1023/A:1025713518156 · DOI
  22. Gamson, 1992, Talking Politics
  23. Curran, 2005, The Press, 120
  24. 10.7208/chicago/9780226042862.001.0001 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10651-005-6817-1 · DOI
  26. Cornell, 2007, Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World
  27. Skolnick, 1993, Above the Law: Police and the Excessive Use of Force
  28. Dawson, 1995, Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics, 10.1515/9780691212982 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/07418825.2011.628945 · DOI
  30. Kennedy, 1997, Race, Crime, and the Law
  31. Sharp, 1999, The Sometime Connection: Public Opinion and Social Policy
  32. 10.1080/10439463.1994.9964673 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/009365084011003001 · DOI
  34. Massey, 1998, American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass
  35. Lewis, 2004, The Changing Terrain of Race and Ethnicity, 67
  36. Weaver, 2006, The American Journalist in the 21st Century: U.S. News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Simmons, A. D.
Affiliations
Colgate University (US)
Corresponding author
Simmons, Alicia D.
ORCID
Simmons, Alicia D.
Venue
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2017
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
639-663
ISSN
  • 1742-058X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-0598
DOI
10.1017/s1742058x17000212
OpenAlex
W2799450954
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 396 d)
Locations
Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
Keywords
media coverage, newsworthiness, racial disparities in policing, video evidence, civil litigation, nonviolent resistance, social construction of reality, media agenda setting, racialized violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review