Cited by 117Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

REASSESSING “TOWARD A THEORY OF RACE, CRIME, AND URBAN INEQUALITY”: Enduring and New Challenges in 21stCentury America

Sampson, Robert J., Wilson, William Julius, Katz, Hanna·2018·Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

Abstract

In “Toward a Theory of Race, Crime, and Urban Inequality,” Sampson and Wilson (1995) argued that racial disparities in violent crime are attributable in large part to the persistent structural disadvantages that are disproportionately concentrated in African American communities. They also argued that the ultimate causes of crime were similar for both Whites and Blacks, leading to what has been labeled the thesis of “racial invariance.” In light of the large scale social changes of the past two decades and the renewed political salience of race and crime in the United States, this paper reassesses and updates evidence evaluating the theory. In so doing, we clarify key concepts from the original thesis, delineate the proper context of validation, and address new challenges. Overall, we find that the accumulated empirical evidence provides broad but qualified support for the theoretical claims. We conclude by charting a dual path forward: an agenda for future research on the linkages between race and crime, and policy recommendations that align with the theory’s emphasis on neighborhood level structural forces but with causal space for cultural factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1742058x18000140

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The appearance of differences in violent crime rates between people of color and White people can largely be explained by historic segregation and ongoing discrimination leading people of color to be disproportionately likely to live in spaces marked by concentrated socioeconomic disadvantage and social risk factors.

    “Moreover, the appearance of differences in violent crime rates between people of color and White people can largely be explained by the fact that historic segregation and ongoing discrimination lead people of color to be disproportionately likely to live in spaces marked by concentrated socioeconomic disadvantage and social risk factors”

    From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Sampson et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sampson, R. J., Wilson, W. J., & Katz, H.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Sampson, Robert J.
Venue
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
Published
2018
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
13-34
ISSN
  • 1742-058X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-0598
OpenAlex
W2883169698
Cited by
117
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
18.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Keywords
race and crime, urban inequality, structural disadvantage, African American community, neighborhood effects, criminal policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review