REASSESSING “TOWARD A THEORY OF RACE, CRIME, AND URBAN INEQUALITY”: Enduring and New Challenges in 21stCentury America
Abstract
In “Toward a Theory of Race, Crime, and Urban Inequality,” Sampson and Wilson (1995) argued that racial disparities in violent crime are attributable in large part to the persistent structural disadvantages that are disproportionately concentrated in African American communities. They also argued that the ultimate causes of crime were similar for both Whites and Blacks, leading to what has been labeled the thesis of “racial invariance.” In light of the large scale social changes of the past two decades and the renewed political salience of race and crime in the United States, this paper reassesses and updates evidence evaluating the theory. In so doing, we clarify key concepts from the original thesis, delineate the proper context of validation, and address new challenges. Overall, we find that the accumulated empirical evidence provides broad but qualified support for the theoretical claims. We conclude by charting a dual path forward: an agenda for future research on the linkages between race and crime, and policy recommendations that align with the theory’s emphasis on neighborhood level structural forces but with causal space for cultural factors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The appearance of differences in violent crime rates between people of color and White people can largely be explained by historic segregation and ongoing discrimination leading people of color to be disproportionately likely to live in spaces marked by concentrated socioeconomic disadvantage and social risk factors.
“Moreover, the appearance of differences in violent crime rates between people of color and White people can largely be explained by the fact that historic segregation and ongoing discrimination lead people of color to be disproportionately likely to live in spaces marked by concentrated socioeconomic disadvantage and social risk factors”
From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Sampson et al., 2018
Cites
2. Toward a Theory of Race, Crime, and Urban Inequality
Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995) · Crime and Inequality · doi:10.1515/9781503615557-004 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
Self-citationMore than just race: being black and poor in the inner city
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-3523 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Self-citationWhite, Black, and Latino Homicide Rates: Why the Difference?
Phillips, J. A. (2002) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.3.349 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems.
Najdowski, C. J., & Stevenson, M. C. (2022) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000510 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sampson, R. J., Wilson, W. J., & Katz, H.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sampson, Robert J.
- ORCID
- Sampson, Robert J.
- Venue
- Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-34
- ISSN
- 1742-058X (ISSN-L)
- 1742-0598
- OpenAlex
- W2883169698
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 18.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Keywords
- race and crime, urban inequality, structural disadvantage, African American community, neighborhood effects, criminal policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review