Cited by 58Organic Food and AgricultureAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgriculture and Rural Development Research

Short food supply chains: the link between participation and farmers' competencies

Charatsari, Chrysanthi, Kitsios, Fotis, Lioutas, Evagelos D.·2020·Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Abstract

Abstract Research on short food supply chains (SFSCs) has experienced a remarkable growth during recent years, offering ample evidence that the creation of such alternative food distribution networks can bring multiple benefits to both farmers and consumers. Nevertheless, farmers' engagement in SFSCs is still limited in many countries. Two studies designed to illustrate the role of competencies in the development of SFSCs are reported in this paper. The first one assessed the influence of farmers' self-perceived competencies on their willingness to participate in SFSCs. The second examined whether the engagement in SFSCs affects the levels of participants' competency needs. Study 1 revealed that willingness to participate in SFSCs is affected by the levels of farmers' competencies on issues pertaining to management, entrepreneurship, marketing, networking and cooperation. Although other factors such as farmers' citizenship behavior, their environmental concern and the perception that engagement in SFSCs can increase farm income are also associated with this willingness, self-perceived competencies represent the most important set of predictors. Study 2 uncovered that participation in SFSCs increases farmers' needs in all the above-mentioned categories of competencies. Taken together, these results indicate that farmers' competencies significantly affect their involvement in SFSCs, and that engagement in SFSCs augments competency needs, thus highlighting the importance of creating spaces that help farmers develop and exploit new capabilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1742170519000309

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charatsari, C., Kitsios, F., & Lioutas, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • University of Macedonia (GR)
  • Technological Educational Institute of Central Macedonia (GR)
Corresponding author
Charatsari, Chrysanthi
Venue
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Published
2019-09-11
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
643-652
ISSN
  • 0889-1893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-1705
  • 1742-1713
OpenAlex
W2973180692
Cited by
58
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Keywords
short food supply chains, farmer competencies, willingness to participate, competency needs, perceived competence, farmer entrepreneurship, farmer marketing, farmer cooperation, organizational citizenship behavior, environmental concern, farm income, farmer capabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review