Short food supply chains: the link between participation and farmers' competencies
Abstract
Abstract Research on short food supply chains (SFSCs) has experienced a remarkable growth during recent years, offering ample evidence that the creation of such alternative food distribution networks can bring multiple benefits to both farmers and consumers. Nevertheless, farmers' engagement in SFSCs is still limited in many countries. Two studies designed to illustrate the role of competencies in the development of SFSCs are reported in this paper. The first one assessed the influence of farmers' self-perceived competencies on their willingness to participate in SFSCs. The second examined whether the engagement in SFSCs affects the levels of participants' competency needs. Study 1 revealed that willingness to participate in SFSCs is affected by the levels of farmers' competencies on issues pertaining to management, entrepreneurship, marketing, networking and cooperation. Although other factors such as farmers' citizenship behavior, their environmental concern and the perception that engagement in SFSCs can increase farm income are also associated with this willingness, self-perceived competencies represent the most important set of predictors. Study 2 uncovered that participation in SFSCs increases farmers' needs in all the above-mentioned categories of competencies. Taken together, these results indicate that farmers' competencies significantly affect their involvement in SFSCs, and that engagement in SFSCs augments competency needs, thus highlighting the importance of creating spaces that help farmers develop and exploit new capabilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social capital and experience are important in participation in SFSCs.
“This finding supports previous research emphasizing the importance of social capital and experience in participation in SFSCs [31,39,42,47].”
From Who Reaches the Consumer? A Network Analysis of Market Reach Factors of Slovakia's Short Food Supply Chains (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Berti, G., & Mulligan, C. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8070616 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Issues and Challenges in Short Food Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review
Bayir, B., Charles, A., Sekhari, A., & Ouzrout, Y. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14053029 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Varecha, L., Jarábková, J., & Hrivnák, M. (2026) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture16060649
“Participation in SFSC requires new competencies, as producers take on tasks related to logistics, sales, and marketing [42,43].”
- Authors
- Charatsari, C., Kitsios, F., & Lioutas, E. D.
- Affiliations
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- University of Macedonia (GR)
- Technological Educational Institute of Central Macedonia (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Charatsari, Chrysanthi
- Venue
- Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-09-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-652
- ISSN
- 0889-1893 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-1705
- 1742-1713
- OpenAlex
- W2973180692
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
- Keywords
- short food supply chains, farmer competencies, willingness to participate, competency needs, perceived competence, farmer entrepreneurship, farmer marketing, farmer cooperation, organizational citizenship behavior, environmental concern, farm income, farmer capabilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review