Cited by 140Gender Politics and RepresentationGender and Feminist StudiesPolitical Science Research and Education

A Feminist Institutionalist Approach

Kenny, Meryl·2014·Politics & Gender

Abstract

The “institutional turn” in political science reflects a wider consensus among both feminist and mainstream scholars that institutions—broadly defined as the formal and informal “rules of the game”—deeply shape political life. Political institutions are also profoundly gendered. Yet, despite significant advancements in institutional analysis over the past few decades, gender politics scholars continue to grapple with how to “capture” the gendered character and gendering effects of institutions. This contribution explores how insights from feminist institutionalism (see, for example, Kenny 2007; 2013; Krook and Mackay 2011) can help us address these methodological challenges. It argues that a feminist institutionalist approach provides useful insights into the gendered foundations of political institutions, the operation and importance of informal institutions, and the general and gendered mechanisms of continuity and change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1743923x14000488

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Swaraj's institutional innovations exemplify gendered institutional entrepreneurship: the creation of new institutional arrangements that specifically expand women's political opportunities.

    “Figure: institutional innovations exemplify what Kenny (2014) terms “gendered institutional entrepreneurship”-the creation of new institutional arrangements that specifically expand women's political opportunities.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kenny, M.
Affiliations
University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Kenny, Meryl
Venue
Politics & Gender
Published
2014-12
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
679-684
ISSN
  • 1743-923X (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9248
OpenAlex
W2153741325
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Politics & Gender (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
Keywords
feminist institutionalism, institutional turn, gendered institutions, informal institutions, gender politics, institutional analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review