A Feminist Institutionalist Approach
Abstract
The “institutional turn” in political science reflects a wider consensus among both feminist and mainstream scholars that institutions—broadly defined as the formal and informal “rules of the game”—deeply shape political life. Political institutions are also profoundly gendered. Yet, despite significant advancements in institutional analysis over the past few decades, gender politics scholars continue to grapple with how to “capture” the gendered character and gendering effects of institutions. This contribution explores how insights from feminist institutionalism (see, for example, Kenny 2007; 2013; Krook and Mackay 2011) can help us address these methodological challenges. It argues that a feminist institutionalist approach provides useful insights into the gendered foundations of political institutions, the operation and importance of informal institutions, and the general and gendered mechanisms of continuity and change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Swaraj's institutional innovations exemplify gendered institutional entrepreneurship: the creation of new institutional arrangements that specifically expand women's political opportunities.
“Figure: institutional innovations exemplify what Kenny (2014) terms “gendered institutional entrepreneurship”-the creation of new institutional arrangements that specifically expand women's political opportunities.”
From Transcending Boundaries: Sushma Swaraj and the Multidimensional Paradigm of Women's Empowerment in Political Leadership (2025) · cites this paper as Kenny (2014)
Cites
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparing Candidate Selection: A Feminist Institutionalist Approach
Bjarnegård, E., & Kenny, M. (2016) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2016.4 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“(Lowndes 2005: 306; see also Kenny 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationOpening Up the Black Box: Gender and Candidate Selection in a New Era
Kenny, M., & Verge, T. (2016) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2016.5 · Cited by 141
Self-citationGrand Challenges, Feminist Answers
Benschop, Y. (2021) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877211020323 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“…theories, from entrepreneurship (Calás, Smircich, & Bourne, 2009; Verduijn, Dey, Tedmanson, & Essers, 2014) to new institutional theory (Kenny, 2013), and technology and innovation (Schiebinger & Schraudner, 2011), from communication (Ashcraft & Mumby, 2003; Buzzanell, 1994), and…”
BackgroundCollier, C. N., & Raney, T. (2018) · Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxy024 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
When Informality Advantages Women: Quota Networks, Electoral Rules and Candidate Selection in Mexico
Piscopo, J. M. (2016) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2016.11 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“Elite interviews constitute an important tool within processtracing, especially when studying informality: while formal documents – that is, party statutes or electoral laws – stipulate what should happen, insider narratives reveal what does happen, yielding information about the otherwise hidden aspects of actors’ be…”
BackgroundWhy Quotas Are Needed to Improve Women's Access to Services in Clientelistic Regimes
Benstead, L. J. (2015) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12162 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Gender, Power and Privilege in the Parliamentary Workplace
Erikson, J., & Verge, T. (2020) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsaa048 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“It is our task as researchers to make these informal rules visible, in order to change them (Kenny, 2014).”
BackgroundExplaining Gender Gaps in Legislative Committees
Murray, R., & Sénac, R. (2018) · Journal of Women, Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2018.1477397 · Cited by 32
“Yet several female interviewees said it took them years to decode the unwritten rules of the game (Bjarnegård 2013; Franceschet 2011; Kenny 2014).”
BackgroundThe Women, Peace, and Security Agenda and Feminist Institutionalism: A Research Agenda
Thomson, J. (2018) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viy052 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Keeping Men In, Shutting Women Out: Gender Biases in Candidate Selection Processes in Uruguay
Johnson, N. (2016) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2016.6 · Cited by 22
“Recent theoretical developments within feminist institutionalism (Kenny 2014; Krook and Mackay 2011a; Mackay et al. 2010) provide useful analytical frameworks for exploring the relevance and interaction between three types of formal and informal institutions – systemic, practical and normative…”
BackgroundThe Making and Unmaking ofFeminicidio/FemicidioLaws in Mexico and Nicaragua
Moral, P. G.-D., & Neumann, P. (2018) · Law & society review · doi:10.1111/lasr.12380 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Toward intersectional and culturally relevant sex and gender analysis in health research.
Rotz, S., Rose, J., Masuda, J., Lewis, D., & Castleden, H. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114459 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Trans* and gender variant citizenship and the state in Norway
Monro, S., & van der Ros, J. (2018) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018317733084 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Feminist institutionalism shows how cis females’ unequal social positions are normalised via male-dominated organisations and mechanisms (see Kenny, 2014); this process also applies to the normalisation of gender binaries.”
BackgroundMethodPower-seeking, networking and competition: why women do not rise in parties
Ohmura, T., & Bailer, S. (2022) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2022.2097442 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Recent feminist institutionalist approaches underline how a lack of political ambition is also shaped by context and institutions, such as gendered opportunity structures which favour men (Carroll and Sanbonmatsu 2013; Kenny 2014).”
BackgroundErlandsen, M., Hernández-Garza, M. F., & Schulz, C. (2021) · Political research quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912921997922 · Cited by 15
The European Union and Regional gender equality agendas: Wales in the shadow of Brexit
Minto, R., & Parken, A. (2020) · Regional studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1826422 · Cited by 15
“In keeping with an FI approach, which seeks to map the formal rules of politics and the actions of informal actors (Kenny, 2014) we employed a qualitiative research methodology, seeking a nuanced understanding of the time, place, political contexts as well as the motivations of the key actors.”
MethodQuotas and Gender Competence: Independent or Complementary Approaches to Gender Equality?
Wroblewski, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2021.740462 · Cited by 13
“These policies and achieved or expected results regarding gender equality are discussed from a feminist institutionalist perspective (Kenny, 2014; Krook and Mackay, 2011; Mackay et al., 2010) and a practice theoretical point of view (Schatzki, 1996; Schatzki, 2003).”
BackgroundElecting to Do Women's Work? Gendered Divisions of Labor in U.K. Select Committees, 1979–2016
Goodwin, M., Bates, S. H., & McKay, S. (2020) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x19000874 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Gender, Power, and Left Politics: From Feminization to “Feministization”
Dean, J., & Maiguashca, B. (2018) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x18000193 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“…Eschle and Maiguashca 2010); the “feminization” literature in political science (Lovenduski 2005); and an array of other feminist research on gender and organizations (Kenny 2014; Puwar 2004), gender and social movements (Coleman and Bassi 2011), and the politics of affect (Dean 2014; Ahmed 2004).”
BackgroundMethodNegotiating change for gender equality: identifying leverages, overcoming barriers
Linková, M., & Mergaert, L. (2021) · Investigaciones Feministas · doi:10.5209/infe.72319 · Cited by 12
“…can change due both to external and internal influences, putting forward “a bounded model of institutional change” (Mackay et al, 2010, 578) or “bounded innovation” (Kenny, 2014) through the incremental processes of displacement, layering, drift and conversion (Mahoney and Thelen, 2010).”
BackgroundRothermel, A. (2021) · Critical Studies on Terrorism · doi:10.1080/17539153.2021.1969061 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“From this perspective, understanding expressed ideas about gender helps understand institutional reform processes by taking into account how gender discourses affect institutional dynamics and vice versa (Kenny 2014).”
BackgroundGordon, E. (2018) · Co-operation, Contestation and Complexity in Peacebuilding · doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1516389 · Cited by 10
“Theoretically, this article adopts a feminist institutional approach, drawing from the work of Kenny (2013), Mackay and Krook (2015), and Mackay, Kenny, and Chappell (2010), in particular.”
BackgroundMethodRunning up Against a Brick Wall: U.S. Metajournalistic Discourse of Gender Equality in Newsrooms
Geertsema-Sligh, M., & Vos, T. P. (2022) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2022.2112905 · Cited by 9
Introduction: Gendering the Everyday in the UK House of Commons—Beneath the Spectacle
Miller, C. M. (2021) · Gendering the Everyday in the UK House of Commons · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64239-6_1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Feminist institutionalists have been interested in informal practices and institutions (Krook and Mackay 2011; Kenny 2013, 2014; Kenny and Bjarnegard 2015).”
BackgroundAkram, S., & Young, Z. P. (2020) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/1478929920910363 · Cited by 9
“A feminist institutional analysis ‘genders institutionalism’ (Lovenduski, 2011), showing how institutions privilege malestream ways of working, highlighting how bias exists and can be understood as stereotypes, norms, opinions and work–place culture (Kenny, 2014; Mackay et al., 2010).”
BackgroundRe-visiting Gender Equality Policy and the Role of University Top Management
Lipinsky, A., & Wroblewski, A. (2021) · Gender, Power and Higher Education in a Globalised World · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69687-0_8 · Cited by 9
Begum, N., & Sobolewska, M. (2024) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x24000047 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Waddingham, J. A., Chandler, J. A., Alexander, K. C., Zafar, S., & Anglin, A. H. (2024) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106467 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Rayment, E., & McCallion, E. (2023) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2023.2173283 · Cited by 7
“Feminist Institutionalism (FI) holds that legislators ’ inclination and ability to act as substantive representatives depend on the (dis)incentives and opportunities within their gendered institutional contexts (Franceschet, 2011; Kenny, 2014; Mackay et al., 2010; Tremblay, 2003).”
BackgroundFeminist Institutionalist Interpretation of Forest Tenure Regimes in Nepal
Wagle, R., Oli, D., Sapkota, B., Aryal, S., & Prajapati, S. (2017) · doi:10.3126/jfl.v15i1.23095 · Cited by 7
“Out of these four facets, following Kenny (2014), we take institutional continuity and change as well as formal and informal institutions into consideration in order to analyse forest tenure regimes from feminist institutionalist perspective.”
BackgroundInfluentialBolzendahl, C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64006-8_8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Josefsson, C. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197788592.001.0001 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hutchinson, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogz066 · Cited by 5
Bradshaw, S., Linneker, B., & Sanders-McDonagh, E. (2018) · The European Journal of Women's Studies · doi:10.1177/1350506819847233 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Descriptive Representation and Party Building: Evidence from Municipal Governments in Brazil
Goyal, T., & Sells, C. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423001168 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…in comparative politics that draws on feminist institutionalist theory to illuminate how gender relations shape women ’ s behavior inside legislatures and in political parties (Barnes 2016; Clayton and Zetterberg 2021; Htun 2002; Kenny 2014; Krook and Mackay 2011; Sacchet 2011; Wylie 2018).”
The evolution of women’s civil society organizations in the Deep South of Thailand
Suwardi, A., & Chambers, P. (2022) · Asian Affairs An American Review · doi:10.1080/00927678.2022.2132084 · Cited by 4
“…therefore, again, inserting gender perspective is requisite to inclusively including women as an entity in the institutional system.46 According to Kenny (2013), feminists have claimed that institutions intertwine gendered relationships between the construction of masculinity and femininity in…”
BackgroundHibbs, L. (2022) · Journal for Cultural Research · doi:10.1080/14797585.2021.2011365 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wroblewski, A., & Grasenick, K. (2025) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.9992 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The present analysis is therefore embedded in the theoretical framework of feminist institutionalism (Kenny, 2014; Krook & Mackay, 2011; Mackay et al., 2011).”
The political economy of gender mainstreaming in energy access in Sierra Leone
Appiah, S., Plutshack, V., Agradi, M., Klug, T. W., Nunoo, I., & Saparapa, R. (2024) · Environmental Research: Climate · doi:10.1088/2752-5295/ad8f59 · Cited by 3
“In doing so, the focus is often on the formal and informal ‘rules of the game’ (Kenny 2007, 2014, Mackay et al 2010, Krook and Mackay 2011).”
When the House is Not a Home: Assessing the Family-Friendliness of Canadian Legislatures
Johnstone, R. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique · doi:10.1017/s0008423924000167 · Cited by 3
“A feminist, institutionalist approach seeks to systematically uncover the ways in which the “ formal and informal dimensions ” of institutions are gendered (Kenny, 2014: 679-80).”
Gender mainstreaming in times of crisis: Missed opportunities in pandemic policymaking
Callerstig, A.-C., & Strid, S. (2023) · Papers. Revista de Sociologia · doi:10.5565/rev/papers.3174 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gender Equality Legislation and Institutions at the Local Level in Kenya : Experiences of the Maasai
Memusi, S. S. (2020) · EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) · doi:10.15495/epub_ubt_00004576 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“A historical outlook on gender politics is important since placing politics in time helps to understand the emergence of a particular outcome (Kenny, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialGerard, K. (2026) · doi:10.51952/9781529259247 · Cited by 2
Evans, E., & Reher, S. (2026) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2025.103040 · Cited by 2
La PAIF du Canada a-t-elle changé la coopération avec Haïti?
Baranyi, S., & Louis, N. S. (2025) · Canadian Foreign Policy · doi:10.1080/11926422.2025.2603704 · Cited by 2
“Cette approche, influencée par les travaux pionniers de Krook et Mackay 13 et de Kenny 14 , attire notre attention d’abord sur l’effet que la PAIF, en tant que norme nationale, a eu sur la coopération: les opportunités qu’elle a créées et les contraintes qu’elle a imposées.”
Formal and Informal Institutions: Women Diplomats in Leadership at Japan’s Foreign Ministry
Flowers, P. (2025) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x25100366 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Feminist institution-alist approaches highlight the role of formal and informal institutional rules in continuity and change in gendered institutions (Chappell and Mackay 2017, 25 – 28; Kenny 2013; Waylen 2017).”
Feminist Institutionalism and Ethnography: Crafting Research from a Diverse Methodological Menu
Grahn, M., & Miller, C. (2025) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x24000527 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…of their definition of institutions, FI scholars generally agree that uncovering the institutional sources of gender inequalities necessitates complex empirical approaches that capture multiple footprints of institutional power (Bjarnegård and Kenny 2016; Kenny 2014; Lowndes 2020; Waylen 2017).”
InfluentialBeating the Odds: Women’s Leadership in International Organizations
Sokolova, M. V., DiCaprio, A., Collinson, N. B., & Quirante, Z. (2023) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x23000107 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Finally, this literature acknowledges the methodological challenges associated with capturing gender impacts (Kenny 2014).”
BackgroundFeminist perspectives and cultural policies in Barcelona
Villarroya, A., & Casals-Balaguer, M. (2022) · Cultural Trends · doi:10.1080/09548963.2022.2070725 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“To this end, we adopt a feminist institutionalist approach which will help us address these resistances as the foundations of political institutions, institutional processes, and mechanisms of continuity and change are gendered (Kenny, 2014).”
MethodGendering Politics, Institutions and the Executive: Bachelet in Context
Waylen, G. (2016) · doi:10.1057/9781137501981_2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Gender Diversity in Aviation: Barriers, Opportunities, and Pathways for Equity
Efthymiou, M. (2026) · Transportation Research Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2026.01.002 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pallathadka, H., & Roy, P. D. (2025) · Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology · doi:10.55544/jrasb.4.3.11 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Sembiring, A. F., & Garunja, E. (2026) · Jurnal Hukum Progresif · doi:10.14710/jhp.14.1.1-48 · Cited by 1
Katz, L., Angelis, I. D., & Alexander, R. (2026) · Australian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1080/10361146.2026.2642819 · Cited by 1
“Feminist institutionalist scholarship suggests that increases in descriptive representation alone does not automatically change institutional norms (Acker 2012; Kenny 2014; Mackay, Kenny, and Chappell 2010).”
InfluentialHoque, M. A., Azim, M., & Parvin, F. (2026) · Women's Studies: International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103269 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
(2025) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197793985.001.0001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mullen, E. M., & Bouris, D. (2025) · Journal of International Relations and Development · doi:10.1057/s41268-025-00347-8 · Cited by 1
“Combining feminist and new institutionalist premises, such an approach recognises the gendered nature of these institutions, but also how they in turn produce gendered effects themselves (Kenny 2014: 679; Mackay et al. 2010: 581; Ansorg and Haastrup 2018: 1130).”
The complex relationship between leadership and gendered experiences:asandwith
Erwin, S. K. (2022) · Defence Studies · doi:10.1080/14702436.2022.2092473 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Institutions, the formal and informal rules of the game by which members navigate the logics of appropriateness (Kenny 2014), include norms, practices, and discourses, which prescribe and proscribe what is often considered acceptable for men and women as masculine and feminine.”
BackgroundTalking the Talk, Walking the Walk: A Critical Examination of Gender in CIE
Park, M. F., Davidson, P. M., Dzotsenidze, N., Okogbue, O., & Wiseman, A. W. (2020) · Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2019 · doi:10.1108/s1479-367920200000039001 · Cited by 1
Thomson, J. (2016) · British Politics · doi:10.1057/bp.2015.47
A feminist institutionalist consideration for analyzing gender in public relations
Mitson, R. (2026) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2026.102782
Baraka, H. E., Michrafy, R., Rhazzali, M. K., & Assaoui, L. E. (2026) · The social science · doi:10.3390/socsci15100688
Beyond the badge: how senior policewomen resist, conform and redefine leadership norms
Orole, F., Anthony, M., Nathan, S. B. M. G., Tehseen, S., Hopkins, T., Koon, V., Ogundoyin, O. R., & Gora, R. M. (2026) · Equality, Diversity and Inclusion · doi:10.1108/edi-04-2025-0279
Reproductive rights and democratic backsliding in the United States and Romania: A comparison
Ivănescu, M., & Filimon, L. (2026) · Women's Studies: International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2026.103368
The role of political parties’ women’s wings towards inclusive leadership in Tanzania
Sanga, B., Demzee, M., Mosha, A., & Kihaka, A. (2026) · African Quarterly Social Science Review · doi:10.51867/aqssr.3.3.23
“Furthermore, the findings on sabotage and exclusion from political competition support feminist institutionalist arguments by Kenny (2014) and Mackay and Murtagh (2019).”
Johnson, N. (2026) · Journal of Women, Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2026.2675870
“In the years following the first national elections with quota application (2014), the UTDC was inundated with cases, the most serious of which were passed on to Javier Miranda, who had assumed the presidency of the FA in mid 2016.”
InfluentialSacchet, T., Scheidweiler, G., & Wylie, K. (2026) · Journal of Women, Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2026.2672910
Hutchinson, S. (2026) · Australian Journal of International Affairs · doi:10.1080/10357718.2026.2682210
“Combined with discussion of their experiences of, and the policy and process of the Department of Home Affairs, the paper also contributes to the scholarship on feminist institutionalism (Kenny 2014).”
Dawuni, J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197795095.001.0001
Barriers and Facilitators of Women’s Leadership in Academic Medicine in China: A Qualitative Study
Li, S., Chu, H., Ribaudo, J., Shen, N., & Moyer, C. A. (2026) · Journal of Healthcare Leadership · doi:10.2147/jhl.s564954
“15 This study’s contribution lies not in discovering entirely new categories of barriers, but in revealing how globally recognized barriers are refracted through China’s specific institutional and cultural lens.”
Rothermel, A. (2025) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqaf081
Opportunities and influence: women’s representation and advocacy in the Canadian Parliament
Rayment, E., & McCallion, E. (2025) · European Journal of Politics and Gender · doi:10.1332/25151088y2025d000000092
Representación política y género en América Latina
Martin, M. E. (2024) · Descentrada · doi:10.24215/25457284e223
Invisible and yet hypervisible: gendered misconduct and the U.S. military
Erwin, S. K., & Cseh, M. (2023) · Industrial and Commercial Training · doi:10.1108/ict-10-2022-0075
Hudáčková, S. (2023) · Studia Politica Slovaca · doi:10.31577/sps.2022-2.1
Rethinking Gender Centres in Nigerian Universities
Igiebor, O. (2022) · Journal of Gender Culture and Society · doi:10.32996/jgcs.2022.2.2.2
“For example, Thomson (2017) posited that FI scholars have questioned why institutions hinder greater women’s representation (Kenny, 2013b); how informal institutions can inhibit progressive gendered change (Waylen, 2014), and why new institutions revert to older practices which can often signal…”
BackgroundMulyampiti, T. (2021) · doi:10.1080/10130950.2021.1917299
“Hence, the State as a collection of institutions offers complex and varying opportunities for gender-mainstreaming strategies and for feminist engagement (Spary 2008), which may provide significant openings or limitations for gender-responsive development policy (Kenny 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialGendering Institutions and Devolution
Thomson, J. (2018) · Abortion Law and Political Institutions · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96169-9_2
Abortion Law and Political Institutions: Conclusion
Thomson, J. (2018) · Abortion Law and Political Institutions · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96169-9_8
de Cabo, R. M., Martínez-Martínez, M., Contreras, G., & Gimeno, R. (2026) · Women's Studies: International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2026.103388
Post-Conflict Institutional Design in Kosovo and Northern Ireland
Potter, M. (2019) · Inclusion in Post-Conflict Legislatures · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25536-7_3
- Authors
- Kenny, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kenny, Meryl
- ORCID
- Kenny, Meryl
- Venue
- Politics & Gender
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 679-684
- ISSN
- 1743-923X (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9248
- OpenAlex
- W2153741325
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Politics & Gender (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Keywords
- feminist institutionalism, institutional turn, gendered institutions, informal institutions, gender politics, institutional analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review