Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 63Gender Politics and RepresentationGender, Security, and ConflictMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Women's Movements and Constitution Making after Civil Unrest and Conflict in Africa: The Cases of Kenya and Somalia

Tripp, Aili Mari·2016·Politics & Gender
DOI 10.1017/s1743923x16000015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As numerous conflicts have come to an end in Africa over the past two decades, women's movements have sought to advance a women's rights agenda through peace accords; through constitutional, legislative, and electoral reforms; as well as through the introduction of gender quotas. This article focuses the impact women's movements have had in shaping constitutions after periods of turmoil, particularly in areas of equality, customary law, antidiscrimination, violence against women, quotas, and citizenship rights. It demonstrates how countries that have come out of major civil conflict and violent upheaval in Africa after the mid-1990s—but especially after 2000—have made more constitutional changes with respect to women's rights than other African countries. The second part of the article provides two examples of how women's movements influenced constitutional changes pertaining to gender equality as well as the difficulties they encountered, particularly with respect to the international community.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1743923x16000015

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Hirsch, 1998, Pronouncing and Persevering : Gender and the Discourses of Disputing in an African Islamic Court. Language and Legal Discourse
  2. Affi, 2003, Sub-Saharan Africa: The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Women’s Issues Worldwide
  3. Andrews, 2001, Post-Apartheid Constitutions, 326
  4. Ndegwa, 2012, History of Constitution Making in Kenya
  5. Somali Midnimo.com. 2012. “Women Walk out of Draft Constitution Ratification Conference.” July 31.
  6. Maingi, 2011, The Kenyan Constitutional Reform Process: A Case Study on the Work of Fida Kenya in Securing Women's Rights, Feminist Africa, 15, 63
  7. Hollier-Larousse, 2000, Somali Women Win Political Emancipation with Parliamentary Quota
  8. Albertyn, 2011, Gendered Transformation in South African Jurisprudence: Poor Women and the Constitutional Court (Law and Poverty Special Edition), Stellenbosch Law Review, 22, 591

Cited by

See all 63

Related

Metadata

Authors
Tripp, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Tripp, Aili Mari
ORCID
Tripp, Aili Mari
Venue
Politics & Gender
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2016-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
78-106
ISSN
  • 1743-923X (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9248
DOI
10.1017/s1743923x16000015
OpenAlex
W2307471620
Cited by
60
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
15.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 22 d)
Locations
Politics & Gender (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Security, and Conflict
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Keywords
women's movement, constitutional drafting, post-conflict reconstruction, women's rights, gender equality, gender quotas, customary law, violence against women, citizenship rights, anti-discrimination, Kenya, Somalia, peace agreements, international community

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.