The DOI matches its Crossref record; 198 of the 198 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of ‘natural’ products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production
Open accessAbstract
The banning in 2006 of the use of antibiotics as animal growth promoters in the European Union has increased demand from producers for alternative feed additives that can be used to improve animal production. This review gives an overview of the most common non-antibiotic feed additives already being used or that could potentially be used in ruminant nutrition. Probiotics, dicarboxylic acids, enzymes and plant-derived products including saponins, tannins and essential oils are presented. The known modes of action and effects of these additives on feed digestion and more especially on rumen fermentations are described. Their utility and limitations in field conditions for modern ruminant production systems and their compliance with the current legislation are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review
Burt, S. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022 · Cited by 10,488
AFRC, R. F. (1989) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x · Cited by 4,149
Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – 1979
(1980) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-04245-4 · Cited by 1,615
Santos-Buelga, C., & Scalbert, A. (2000) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(20000515)80:7<1094::aid-jsfa569>3.0.co;2-1 · Cited by 1,258
Makkar, H. P. S. (2003) · Small Ruminant Research · doi:10.1016/s0921-4488(03)00142-1 · Cited by 1,159
Min, B. R., Barry, T. N., Attwood, G. T., & McNabb, W. C. (2003) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00041-5 · Cited by 1,051
Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health
Mueller‐Harvey, I. (2006) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2577 · Cited by 965
Nutritional toxicology of tannins and related polyphenols in forage legumes
Reed, J. D. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7351516x · Cited by 801
Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants
McSweeney, C. S., Palmer, B., McNeill, D. M., & Krause, D. O. (2001) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(01)00232-2 · Cited by 780
Toxicology rethinks its central belief
Calabrese, E. J., & Baldwin, L. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/421691a · Cited by 719
Cited by
Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale
Martin, C., Morgavi, D. P., & Doreau, M. (2010) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731109990620 · Cited by 886
Self-citationProgress in Alternative Strategies to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance: Focus on Antibiotics
Murugaiyan, J., Kumar, P. A., Rao, G. S., Iskandar, K., Hawser, S., Hays, J. P., Mohsen, Y., Adukkadukkam, S., Awuah, W. A., Jose, R. A. M., et al. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics11020200 · Cited by 567
Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites
Bodas, R., Prieto, N., García-González, R., Andrés, S., Giráldez, F. J., & López, S. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.010 · Cited by 437
Critical evaluation of essential oils as rumen modifiers in ruminant nutrition: a review
Cobellis, G., Trabalza-Marinucci, M., & Yu, Z. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.103 · Cited by 291
Role of Secondary Plant Metabolites on Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants
Ku-Vera, J. C., Jiménez-Ocampo, R., Valencia-Salazar, S. S., Montoya-Flores, M. D., Molina-Botero, I. C., Arango, J., Gómez-Bravo, C. A., Aguilar-Pérez, C. F., & Solorio-Sánchez, F. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00584 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Jouany, J.-P., & Morgavi, D. P.
- Venue
- Animal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1443-1466
- ISSN
- 1751-7311 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127748536
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 198
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of ‘natural’ products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1751731107000742
- The paper
- Jouany, J.-P., & Morgavi, D. P. (2007). Use of ‘natural’ products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production. Animal. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731107000742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
