CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluoroscopic study of oral behaviours in response to the presence of a bit and the effects of rein tension

Manfredi, Jane M, Rosenstein, Diana, Lanovaz, Joel L, Nauwelaerts, Sandra, Clayton, Hilary M·2009·Comparative Exercise Physiology
DOI 10.1017/s1755254010000036
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated intra-oral behaviours in horses wearing different bits with and without rein tension. Six riding horses wore a bridle and three bits: jointed snaffle, KK Ultra and Myler comfort snaffle. Lateral fluoroscopic images (30 Hz) were recorded for 20 s for each bit with loose reins and with 25 ± 5 N bilateral rein tension. The videos were analysed to determine time spent in the following behaviours: mouth quiet, gently mouthing the bit, retracting the tongue, bulging the dorsum of the tongue over the bit, lifting the bit and other behaviours that were performed infrequently. Repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that behaviours did not differ between bits, so bit type was not predictive of behaviour, but there were significant effects of horse and rein tension. Horses spent less time quiet and more time mouthing the bit, retracting the tongue and bulging the tongue over the bit when tension was applied.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1755254010000036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.2746/095777307X179882 · DOI
  2. Anthony, 1991, Antiquity, 65, 22, 10.1017/S0003598X00079278 · DOI
  3. Engelke, 2003, Equine Veterinary Education, 15, 200, 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2003.tb00235.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Preuschoft, 1999, Deutsche tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 106, 169
  5. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2003.tb00112.x · DOI
  6. 10.1079/ECP200553 · DOI
  7. Knox-Thompson, 1990, Pony Club Manual No. 2
  8. Myler, 2000, A Whole Bit Better
  9. 10.1079/ECP200564 · DOI
  10. 10.1079/ECP200569 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0737-0806(85)80050-2 · DOI
  12. Kapitzke, 2004, The Bit and the Reins
  13. 10.1016/S0737-0806(84)80141-0 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.964 · DOI
  15. Johnson, 2002, Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, 48, 458
  16. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.020 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S0737-0806(99)80067-7 · DOI
  18. 2009, Rules for Dressage Events
  19. Dyce, 2002, Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Manfredi, J. M., Rosenstein, D., Lanovaz, J. L., Nauwelaerts, S., & Clayton, H. M.
Venue
Comparative Exercise Physiology
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2009-11
Volume
6
Issue
04
Pages
143-148
ISSN
  • 1755-2540
  • 1755-2559
DOI
10.1017/s1755254010000036
Cited by
45
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review