The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law: Adopted by the Assembly of the International Committee of the Red Cross on 26 February 2009
Abstract
The present document resulted from an expert process initiated and conducted by the ICRC from 2003 to 2008. Dr. Nils Melzer, Legal Adviser at the ICRC, who has been responsible for the expert process since 2004, is the author of the Interpretive Guidance and most background documents and expert meeting reports produced during the process. The ICRC would like to express its gratitude to the experts, all of whom participated in the process in their personal capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Asaro, P. (2012) · International Review of the Red Cross · doi:10.1017/s1816383112000768 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Venue
- International Review of the Red Cross
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 872
- Pages
- 991-1047
- ISSN
- 0020-8604 (ISSN-L)
- 1816-3831
- 1607-5889
- OpenAlex
- W65685428
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 76.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law: Adopted by the Assembly of the International Committee of the Red Cross on 26 February 2009. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1816383109000319
- The paper
- Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law: Adopted by the Assembly of the International Committee of the Red Cross on 26 February 2009. (2008). International Review of the Red Cross. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383109000319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
