Mycological rationality: Heuristics, perception and decision-making in mushroom foraging
Open accessAbstract
How do mushroom foragers make safe and efficient decisions under uncertainty, or deal with the genuine risks of misidentification and poisoning? This article is an inquiry into ecological rationality, heuristics, perception, and decision-making in mushroom foraging. By surveying 894 Finnish mushroom foragers, this article illustrates how socially learned rules of thumb and heuristics are used in mushroom foraging, and how simple heuristics are often complemented by more complex and intuitive decision-making. The results illustrate how traditional foraging cultures have evolved precautionary heuristics to deal with uncertainties and poisonous species, and how foragers develop selective attention through experience. The study invites us to consider whether other human foraging cultures might use heuristics similarly, how and why such traditions have culturally evolved, and whether early hunter-gatherers might have used simple heuristics to deal with uncertainty.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mushroom picking is part of the culture/cultural heritage in many European countries.
“While mushroom picking may not be prominent in all cultures, it is an integral part of cultural heritage in many European countries.”
From Effects of Explainable Artificial Intelligence on trust and human behavior in a high-risk decision task (2023) · cites this paper as Kaaronen, 2020
The decision of whether to pick a mushroom or leave it is typically fast, made within seconds or minutes, and characterized as 'fast and frugal' based on simple rules, such as avoiding spotted mushrooms.
“In contrast, the decision of whether to pick a mushroom or leave it is typically fast and made within seconds or minutes and is characterized as 'fast and frugal' based on simple rules, such as avoiding spotted mushrooms (Kaaronen, 2020).”
From Effects of Explainable Artificial Intelligence on trust and human behavior in a high-risk decision task (2023) · cites this paper as Kaaronen, 2020
Cites
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617 · see citing works
Henrich, J. (2016) · doi:10.1515/9781400873296 · Cited by 1,002 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leichtmann, B., Humer, C., Hinterreiter, A., Streit, M., & Mara, M. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107539 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaaronen, R. O.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Kaaronen, Roope O.
- ORCID
- Kaaronen, Roope O.
- Venue
- Judgment and Decision Making
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 630-647
- ISSN
- 1930-2975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313429107
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Judgment and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- mushroom foraging, heuristics, ecological rationality, decision making under uncertainty, selective attention, poisonous mushrooms, misidentification, hunter-gatherers, perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review