A Psychometric Assessment of a Human Resources Practice Measure for Temporary Agency Workers
Open accessAbstract
Studies have proposed and validated several measures that evaluate employee's perceptions of the human resources practices (HRP). However, given the changes occurring in the labor market, there is a need to develop a measure specially adapted to the contingent workers specific employment relationship. Thus, this study assesses an HRP system scale that was administered to temporary agency workers (TAW) to examine the scale's response process, internal structure and relation to other variables (i.e., affective commitment). The measure was administered to 4,551 Portuguese TAW. The Messick's validation framework (1995) was use and two sectors were compared. Descriptive analyses, scale reliabilities, item characteristics, exploratory, confirmatory, and multiple group analyses demonstrated that the measure had good psychometric properties. Moreover, there were positive correlations between the HRP scale and affective commitment. The results contribute to a better understanding of managing TAW's in agencies and client companies. HRP are a valuable method for "communicating" with these workers, who are then able to recognize and respond to the investment. This is the first study to develop and assess the psychometric properties of an HRP system measure for TAW and to cross-validate it with workers' affective commitment towards both companies that are involved in this employment relation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The human resources practices perception scale was adapted, tested, and validated with temporary agency workers by Sobral and colleagues.
“This scale was adapted, tested and validated with TAW by Sobral and colleagues [56], and was previously tested with Portuguese TAW [44].”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data
Downing, S. M. (2003) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x · Cited by 1,434 · see citing works
Labor Market Intermediaries and the New Paradigm for Human Resources
Bonet, R., Cappelli, P., & Hamori, M. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.774213 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis
Sobral, F., Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18136779 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“This scale was adapted, tested and validated with TAW by Sobral and colleagues [56], and was previously tested with Portuguese TAW [44].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citation
- Authors
- Sobral, F., Chambel, M. J., Castanheira, F., & Cesário, F.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT)
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
- ISPA - Instituto Universitário (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Sobral, Filipa
- Venue
- The Spanish Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- E16-E16
- ISSN
- 1138-7416 (ISSN-L)
- 1988-2904
- OpenAlex
- W2935728350
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- The Spanish Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Keywords
- human resource management practices, temporary agency workers, contingent workers, affective commitment, scale development, psychometric validation, cross-validation, employment relationship, Portuguese workers
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personnel Loyalty, Personnel Management, Psychometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review