Cited by 297Public Policy and Administration ResearchSocial Science and Policy ResearchEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Introducing the ‘What's the Problem Represented to be?’ approach

Bacchi, Carol·2012·Engaging with Carol Bacchi

Abstract

The ‘WPR’ approach is a resource, or tool, intended to facilitate critical interrogation of public policies. It starts from the premise that what one proposes to do about something reveals what one thinks is problematic (needs to change). Following this thinking, policies and policy proposals contain implicit representations of what is considered to be the ‘problem’ (‘problem representations’). For example, if forms of training are recommended to improve women's status and promotion opportunities, the implication is that their lack of training is the ‘problem’, responsible for ‘holding them back’. The task in a ‘WPR’ analysis is to read policies with an eye to discerning how the ‘problem’ is represented within them and to subject this problem representation to critical scrutiny. This task is accomplished through a set of six questions and an accompanying undertaking to apply the questions to one's own proposals for change: What's the ‘problem’ (for example, of ‘problem gamblers’, ‘drug use/abuse’, ‘gender inequality’, ‘domestic violence’, ‘global warming’, ‘sexual harassment’, etc.) represented to be in a specific policy or policy proposal? What presuppositions or assumptions underpin this representation of the ‘problem’? How has this representation of the ‘problem’ come about? What is left unproblematic in this problem representation? Where are the silences? Can the ‘problem’ be thought about differently? What effects are produced by this representation of the ‘problem’? How…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/upo9780987171856.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bacchi, C.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Bacchi, Carol
Venue
Engaging with Carol Bacchi
Published
2012-06-01
Pages
21-24
OpenAlex
W2291946549
Cited by
297
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
17.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • University of Adelaide Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
problem representation, critical policy analysis, public policy critique, policy proposals, gender inequality, problematization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review