The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation by a Combination of Elastase Digestion and Neutral Loss Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Loss of phosphoric acid is the most effective fragmentation reaction of pSer- and pThr-containing phosphopeptides of small size (up to 10-15 residues) in low-energy collision-induced dissociation. Therefore, tandem mass spectrometry with neutral loss scanning was evaluated for its utility to analyze protein phosphorylation using protein kinase A (PKA) catalytic subunit, which is phosphorylated at Thr197 and Ser338, as an example. Analysis of tryptic digests of phosphoproteins by tandem mass spectrometry with scanning for neutral loss of phosphoric acid resulted in spectra with poor signal-to-noise ratio, mainly because of the large size of the phosphopeptides formed (>2 kDa). This unfavorable size was caused by the distribution of tryptic cleavage sites in PKA and by interference of phosphorylation with tryptic cleavage. To generate a set of smaller peptide fragments, digestion was performed using the low-specificity protease elastase. Analysis of the total elastase digest with neutral loss scanning resulted in observation of a set of partially overlapping phosphopeptides with high abundance, providing a complete coverage of PKA phosphorylation sites. The peptide size generated by elastase (0.5-1.5 kDa) is ideally suited for this scan mode, which was found to provide the highest specificity for detection of singly charged phosphopeptides (neutral loss of 98). Identification of the PKA phosphorylation sites was performed by mass spectrometric sequencing of the elastase-derived phosphopeptides, which provided highly informative product ion spectra.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins
Beausoleil, S. A., Jedrychowski, M., Schwartz, D., Elias, J. E., Villén, J., Li, J., Cohn, M. A., Cantley, L. C., & Gygi, S. P. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0404720101 · Cited by 1,375
Molina, H., Horn, D. M., Tang, N., Mathivanan, S., & Pandey, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611217104 · Cited by 502
Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry
Boersema, P. J., Mohammed, S., & Heck, A. J. R. (2009) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1599 · Cited by 362
Phosphorylation Analysis by Mass Spectrometry
Steen, H., Jebanathirajah, J. A., Rush, J., Morrice, N., & Kirschner, M. W. (2006) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m500135-mcp200 · Cited by 349
Structural Investigations of Glycoconjugates at High Sensitivity
Mechref, Y., & Novotny, M. V. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0103017 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlosser, A., Pipkorn, R., Bossemeyer, D., & Lehmann, W. D.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-12-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 170-176
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2090804458
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation by a Combination of Elastase Digestion and Neutral Loss Tandem Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac000826j
- The paper
- Schlosser, A., Pipkorn, R., Bossemeyer, D., & Lehmann, W. D. (2001). Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation by a Combination of Elastase Digestion and Neutral Loss Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac000826j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.