The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Implementation and Uses of Automated de Novo Peptide Sequencing by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
There are several computer programs that can match peptide tandem mass spectrometry data to their exactly corresponding database sequences, and in most protein identification projects, these programs are utilized in the early stages of data interpretation. However, situations frequently arise where tandem mass spectral data cannot be correlated with any database sequences. In these cases, the unmatched data could be due to peptides derived from novel proteins, allelic or species-derived variants of known proteins, or posttranslational or chemical modifications. Two additional problems are frequently encountered in high-throughput protein identification. First, it is difficult to quickly sift through large amounts of data to identify those spectra that, due to poor signal or contaminants, can be ignored. Second, it is important to find incorrect database matches (false positives). We have chosen to address these difficulties by performing automatic de novo sequencing using a computer program called Lutefisk. Sequence candidates obtained are used as input in a homology-based database search program called CIDentify to identify variants of known proteins. Comparison of database-derived sequences with de novo sequences allows for electronic validation of database matches even if the latter are not completely correct. Modifications to the original Lutefisk program have been implemented to handle data obtained from triple quadrupole, ion trap, and quadrupole/time-of-flight hybrid (Qtof) mass spectrometers. For example, the linearity of mass errors due to temperature-dependent expansion of the flight tube in a Qtof was exploited such that isobaric amino acids (glutamine/lysine and oxidized methionine/ phenylalanine) can be differentiated without careful attention to mass calibration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry
Ma, B., Zhang, K., Hendrie, C., Liang, C., Li, M., Doherty‐Kirby, A., & Lajoie, G. (2003) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.1196 · Cited by 1,379
InsPecT: Identification of Posttranslationally Modified Peptides from Tandem Mass Spectra
Tanner, S., Shu, H., Frank, A., Wang, L.-C., Zandi, E., Mumby, M., Pevzner, P. A., & Bafna, V. (2005) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac050102d · Cited by 567
Gene clusters involved in anaerobic benzoate degradation of Geobacter metallireducens
Wischgoll, S., Heintz, D., Peters, F., Erxleben, A., Sarnighausen, E., Reski, R., Van Dorsselaer, A., & Boll, M. (2005) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04909.x · Cited by 153
Advances in Ultrahigh Throughput Hit Discovery with Tandem Mass Spectrometry Encoded Libraries
Mata, J. M., van der Nol, E., & Pomplun, S. J. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c04899 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, J. A., & Johnson, R. S.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-05-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2594-2604
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2008317045
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementation and Uses of Automated de Novo Peptide Sequencing by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac001196o
- The paper
- Taylor, J. A., & Johnson, R. S. (2001). Implementation and Uses of Automated de Novo Peptide Sequencing by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac001196o
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.