The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Split Luciferase as an Optical Probe for Detecting Protein−Protein Interactions in Mammalian Cells Based on Protein Splicing
Abstract
We describe a new method for detecting protein-protein interactions in intact mammalian cells; the approach is based on protein splicing-induced complementation of rationally designed fragments of firefly luciferase. The protein splicing is a posttranslational protein modification through which inteins (internal proteins) are excised out from a precursor fusion protein, ligating the flanking exteins (external proteins) into a contiguous polypeptide. As the intein, naturally split DnaE from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 was used: The N- and C-terminal DnaE, each fused respectively to N- and C-terminal fragments of split luciferase, were connected to proteins of interest. In this approach, protein-protein interactions trigger the folding of DnaE intein, wherein the protein splicing occurs and thereby the extein of ligated luciferase recovers its enzymatic activity. To test the applicability of this split luciferase complementation, we used insulin-induced interaction between known binding partners, phosphorylated insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and its target N-terminal SH2 domain of PI 3-kinase. Enzymatic luciferase activity triggered by insulin served to monitor the interaction between IRS-1 and the SH2 domain in an insulin dose-dependent manner, of which amount was assessed by the luminescent intensity. This provides a convenient method to study phosphorylation of any protein or interactions of integral membrane proteins, a class of molecules that has been difficult to study by existing biochemical or genetic methods. High-throughput drug screening and quantitative analysis for a specific pathway in tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in insulin signaling are also made possible in this system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging of Gene Expression
Contag, C. H., & Bachmann, M. H. (2002) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.111901.093336 · Cited by 870
Kerppola, T. K. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125842 · Cited by 709
Psychedelics promote plasticity by directly binding to BDNF receptor TrkB
Moliner, R., Girych, M., Brunello, C. A., Kovaleva, V., Biojone, C., Enkavi, G., Antenucci, L., Kot, E. F., Goncharuk, S. A., Kaurinkoski, K., et al. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01316-5 · Cited by 478
Caenepeel, S., Brown, S. P., Belmontes, B., Moody, G., Keegan, K. S., Chui, D., Whittington, D. A., Huang, X., Poppe, L., Cheng, A. C., et al. (2018) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0387 · Cited by 432
Paulmurugan, R., & Gambhir, S. S. (2003) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac020731c · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Ozawa, T., Kaihara, A., Sato, M., Tachihara, K., & Umezawa, Y.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-04-28
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2516-2521
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2070375075
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Split Luciferase as an Optical Probe for Detecting Protein−Protein Interactions in Mammalian Cells Based on Protein Splicing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0013296
- The paper
- Ozawa, T., Kaihara, A., Sato, M., Tachihara, K., & Umezawa, Y. (2001). Split Luciferase as an Optical Probe for Detecting Protein−Protein Interactions in Mammalian Cells Based on Protein Splicing. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0013296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.